Abstract Spatial Concept Priming Dynamically Influences Real-world Actions

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2012 Oct 13

PMID 23060831

Citations 5

Authors

Sarah M Tower-Richardi

Tad T Brunye

Stephanie A Gagnon

Caroline R Mahoney

Holly A Taylor

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Experienced regularities in our perceptions and actions play important roles in grounding abstract concepts such as social status, time, and emotion. Might we similarly ground abstract spatial concepts in more experienced-based domains? The present experiment explores this possibility by implicitly priming abstract spatial terms (north, south, east, west) and then measuring participants' hand movement trajectories while they respond to a body-referenced spatial target (up, down, left, right) in a verbal (Exp. 1) or spatial (Exp. 2) format. Results from two experiments demonstrate temporally dynamic and prime biased movement trajectories when the primes are incongruent with the targets (e.g., north - left, west - up). That is, priming abstract coordinate directions influences subsequent actions in response to concrete target directions. These findings provide the first evidence that abstract concepts of world-centered coordinate axes are implicitly understood in the context of concrete body-referenced axes; critically, this abstract-concrete relationship manifests in motor movements, and may have implications for spatial memory organization.

Citing Articles

Keeping track of time: Horizontal spatial biases for hours, days, and months.

Malyshevskaya A, Miklashevsky A, Fischer M, Scheepers C, Shtyrov Y, Myachykov A Mem Cognit. 2023; 52(4):894-908.

PMID: 38153647 PMC: 11111500. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-023-01508-1.

Learning a Path from Real Navigation: The Advantage of Initial View, Cardinal North and Visuo-Spatial Ability.

Muffato V, Meneghetti C Brain Sci. 2020; 10(4).

PMID: 32244674 PMC: 7226432. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10040204.

Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Lins J, Schoner G Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019; 81(7):2424-2460.

PMID: 31515771 PMC: 6848251. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01847-9.

Strategies for Selecting Routes through Real-World Environments: Relative Topography, Initial Route Straightness, and Cardinal Direction.

Brunye T, Collier Z, Cantelon J, Holmes A, Wood M, Linkov I PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0124404.

PMID: 25992685 PMC: 4439172. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124404.

The role of body and environment in cognition.

Lynott D, Connell L, Holler J Front Psychol. 2013; 4:465.

PMID: 23885249 PMC: 3717477. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00465.

References

Casasanto D, Chrysikou E . When left is "right". Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychol Sci. 2011; 22(4):419-22. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611401755. View

Kemmerer D, Castillo J, Talavage T, Patterson S, Wiley C . Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from fMRI. Brain Lang. 2007; 107(1):16-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.003. View

Miles L, Nind L, Neil Macrae C . Moving through time. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(2):222-3. DOI: 10.1177/0956797609359333. View

Knoblich G, Flach R . Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychol Sci. 2002; 12(6):467-72. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00387. View

Bodner G, Dypvik A . Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task. Mem Cognit. 2005; 33(1):29-47. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195295. View

Bodner G, Masson M . Beyond spreading activation: an influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003; 10(3):645-52. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196527. View

Balota D, Abrams R . Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995; 21(5):1289-302. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1289. View

Mou W, McNamara T . Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002; 28(1):162-70. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.162. View

Shepard R, Hurwitz S . Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition. 1984; 18(1-3):161-93. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90024-6. View

10.

van Dantzig S, Pecher D, Zeelenberg R, Barsalou L . Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing. Cogn Sci. 2011; 32(3):579-90. DOI: 10.1080/03640210802035365. View

11.

Brunye T, Mahoney C, Gardony A, Taylor H . North is up(hill): route planning heuristics in real-world environments. Mem Cognit. 2010; 38(6):700-12. DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.6.700. View

12.

Murphy G . On metaphoric representation. Cognition. 1996; 60(2):173-204. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1. View

13.

Oliveri M, Bonni S, Turriziani P, Koch G, Lo Gerfo E, Torriero S . Motor and linguistic linking of space and time in the cerebellum. PLoS One. 2009; 4(11):e7933. PMC: 2776278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007933. View

14.

Taylor H, Naylor S, Chechile N . Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective. Mem Cognit. 1999; 27(2):309-19. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211414. View

15.

Feist M, Gentner D . Spatial language influences memory for spatial scenes. Mem Cognit. 2007; 35(2):283-96. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193449. View

16.

Marcel A . Conscious and unconscious perception: experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cogn Psychol. 1983; 15(2):197-237. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90009-9. View

17.

Ditman T, Brunye T, Mahoney C, Taylor H . Simulating an enactment effect: Pronouns guide action simulation during narrative comprehension. Cognition. 2009; 115(1):172-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.014. View

18.

Gagnon S, Brunye T, Robin C, Mahoney C, Taylor H . High and Mighty: Implicit Associations between Space and Social Status. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:259. PMC: 3189624. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00259. View

19.

Wolbers T, Hegarty M . What determines our navigational abilities?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(3):138-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001. View

20.

Cheesman J, Merikle P . Priming with and without awareness. Percept Psychophys. 1984; 36(4):387-95. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202793. View