» Articles » PMID: 2305061

Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis of Chest Image Interpretation with Conventional, Laser-printed, and High-resolution Workstation Images

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 1990 Mar 1
PMID 2305061
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The differences among radiologists in interpreting conventional and digitized images obtained with different radiologic procedures is an important research issue in these times of implementation and growth of the digital modalities. The authors performed a multiobserver study to determine the performance of radiologists reading posteroanterior conventional radiographs, digitized radiographs laser printed onto film, and images displayed on a high-resolution workstation (video monitor). A total of 300 images were evaluated by seven radiologists who recorded their ordinal confidence rating of the presence or absence of one or more of the following abnormalities: interstitial disease, nodule, and pneumothorax. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed statistically significant differences for the detection of different abnormalities by individual readers. The group as a whole showed a significant reduction in observer performance for the detection of interstitial disease and pneumothorax when the laser-printed radiographs or the workstation was used rather than conventional radiographs.

Citing Articles

A multiobserver study of the effects of including point-of-care patient photographs with portable radiography: a means to detect wrong-patient errors.

Tridandapani S, Ramamurthy S, Provenzale J, Obuchowski N, Evanoff M, Bhatti P Acad Radiol. 2014; 21(8):1038-47.

PMID: 25018076 PMC: 4100078. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.03.006.


Effect of LCD monitor type and observer experience on diagnostic performance in soft-copy interpretations of the maxillary sinus on panoramic radiographs.

Kim T, Choi J, Lee S, Huh K, Yi W, Heo M Imaging Sci Dent. 2011; 41(1):11-6.

PMID: 21977468 PMC: 3174453. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2011.41.1.11.


Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach.

Salazar A, Camacho J, Aguirre D J Digit Imaging. 2011; 25(1):91-100.

PMID: 21614654 PMC: 3264722. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9391-0.


Comparison between differently priced devices for digital capture of X-ray films using computed tomography as a gold standard: a multireader-multicase receiver operating characteristic curve study.

Salazar A, Camacho J, Aguirre D Telemed J E Health. 2011; 17(4):275-82.

PMID: 21457011 PMC: 3099052. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0189.


Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.

Gur D, Bandos A, King J, Klym A, Cohen C, Hakim C Med Phys. 2008; 35(10):4404-9.

PMID: 18975686 PMC: 2627510. DOI: 10.1118/1.2977766.