» Articles » PMID: 22972960

Can Proprioceptive Training Improve Motor Learning?

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2012 Sep 14
PMID 22972960
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent work has investigated the link between motor learning and sensory function in arm movement control. A number of findings are consistent with the idea that motor learning is associated with systematic changes to proprioception (Haith A, Jackson C, Mial R, Vijayakumar S. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 21: 593-600, 2008; Ostry DJ, Darainy M, Mattar AA, Wong J, Gribble PL. J Neurosci 30: 5384-5393, 2010; Vahdat S, Darainy M, Milner TE, Ostry DJ. J Neurosci 31: 16907-16915, 2011). Here, we tested whether motor learning could be improved by providing subjects with proprioceptive training on a desired hand trajectory. Subjects were instructed to reproduce both the time-varying position and velocity of novel, complex hand trajectories. Subjects underwent 3 days of training with 90 movement trials per day. Active movement trials were interleaved with demonstration trials. For control subjects, these interleaved demonstration trials consisted of visual demonstration alone. A second group of subjects received visual and proprioceptive demonstration simultaneously; this group was presented with the same visual stimulus, but, in addition, their limb was moved through the target trajectory by a robot using servo control. Subjects who experienced the additional proprioceptive demonstration of the desired trajectory showed greater improvements during training movements than control subjects who only received visual information. This benefit of adding proprioceptive training was seen in both movement speed and position error. Interestingly, additional control subjects who received proprioceptive guidance while actively moving their arm during demonstration trials did not show the same improvement in positional accuracy. These findings support the idea that the addition of proprioceptive training can augment motor learning, and that this benefit is greatest when the subject passively experiences the goal movement.

Citing Articles

The Role of Sensory Impairments on Recovery and Rehabilitation After Stroke.

Hoh J, Semrau J Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2025; 25(1):22.

PMID: 40047982 PMC: 11885399. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-025-01407-9.


Can motor competence be influenced by the type of training interventions preschool children are exposed to? A randomized experimental study comparing sports games and psychomotricity activities.

Guo X, Li C, Zhang Z, Silva A, Clemente F Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1476297.

PMID: 39764074 PMC: 11701235. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1476297.


Using a Webcam to Assess Upper Extremity Proprioception: Experimental Validation and Application to Persons Post Stroke.

Cornella-Barba G, Farrens A, Johnson C, Garcia-Fernandez L, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer D Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39685974 PMC: 11644048. DOI: 10.3390/s24237434.


Immersive interfaces for clinical applications: current status and future perspective.

Chenais N, Gorgen A Front Neurorobot. 2024; 18:1362444.

PMID: 39664264 PMC: 11631914. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1362444.


Short-Term Reproduction of Active Movement with Visual Feedback and Passive Movement with a Therapist's Hands.

Oda H, Fukuda S, Tsujinaka R, Gao H, Hiraoka K Brain Sci. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38928531 PMC: 11201912. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14060531.


References
1.
Wong J, Wilson E, Gribble P . Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 105(5):2512-21. PMC: 3094168. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00949.2010. View

2.
Cohen L, Starr A . Vibration and muscle contraction affect somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurology. 1985; 35(5):691-8. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.35.5.691. View

3.
Liu J, Cramer S, Reinkensmeyer D . Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006; 3:20. PMC: 1569852. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-20. View

4.
Cohen L, Starr A . Localization, timing and specificity of gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement in man. Brain. 1987; 110 ( Pt 2):451-67. DOI: 10.1093/brain/110.2.451. View

5.
Brooke J, Cheng J, Collins D, Mcilroy W, Misiaszek J, Staines W . Sensori-sensory afferent conditioning with leg movement: gain control in spinal reflex and ascending paths. Prog Neurobiol. 1997; 51(4):393-421. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(96)00061-5. View