» Articles » PMID: 22955577

IL-1β and Compressive Forces Lead to a Significant Induction of RANKL-expression in Primary Human Cementoblasts

Overview
Journal J Orofac Orthop
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2012 Sep 8
PMID 22955577
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the response of primary human cementoblasts to conditions as they occur on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement.

Methods: In our previous study, the cementoblasts were characterized using markers for osteoblastogenic differentiation and the cementoblast-specific marker CEMP-1. Initially, primary human cementoblasts were compressed for 1 h, 4 h, and 6 h (30 g/cm(2)). In the second experiment, the cementoblasts were stimulated with interleukin (IL)-1β for 24 h and for 96 h with 1 ng/ml and 10 ng/ml and subsequently compressed for 1 h and 6 h. Changes in mRNA expression for receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK), RANK ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RANK and RANKL were also examined by immunocytochemical staining at the protein level.

Results: Compression (30 g/cm(2)) led to a significant increase in RANKL expression after 6 h. OPG expression in compressed cementoblasts was significantly reduced after 1 h. RANK remained unchanged during the course of the experiment. Stimulation with IL-1β induced RANKL and OPG expression. However, IL-1β-dependent induction of RANKL was more prominent than the induction of OPG, leading to a (significant) increase in the RANKL/OPG ratios. The expression of RANK remained unchanged after 24 h of stimulation with IL-1β and decreased significantly after 96 h. Compression of the prestimulated cells resulted in a further increase in RANKL expression significant after 6 h. OPG and RANK expression remained unchanged compared to the unstimulated sample. COX-2 increased significantly after both compression and stimulation with IL-1β. Combined stimulation and compression resulted in a significant further increase after 6 h compared to IL-1β stimulation alone.

Conclusion: Primary human cementoblasts in vitro express increased levels of RANKL, in particular during the combination of inflammation and compression. The increase in RANKL expression is not compensated by an increase in OPG expression. The induction of RANKL expression was associated with a significant increase in COX-2 expression. Since RANKL attracts osteoclasts, its increase might be associated with the progression of root resorption. The in vitro alterations in cementoblasts we observed may be indicators of cellular mechanisms that lead to the increased root resorption during orthodontic treatment.

Citing Articles

Resveratrol modulates phosphorylation of ERK and AKT in murine cementoblasts during in vitro orthodontic compression.

Negm S, Wolf M, Craveiro R, Schurgers L, Jankowski J, Schneider R BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):226.

PMID: 39939842 PMC: 11823246. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05591-5.


Biological alterations associated with the orthodontic treatment with conventional appliances and aligners: A systematic review of clinical and preclinical evidence.

Goncalves A, Mathelie-Guinlet Q, Ramires F, Monteiro F, Carvalho O, Silva F Heliyon. 2024; 10(12):e32873.

PMID: 39021939 PMC: 11253224. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32873.


Mechanisms of Osteoclastogenesis in Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Orthodontically Induced Tooth Root Resorption.

Nakai Y, Praneetpong N, Ono W, Ono N J Bone Metab. 2023; 30(4):297-310.

PMID: 38073263 PMC: 10721376. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2023.30.4.297.


RANKL senescent cells under mechanical stress: a therapeutic target for orthodontic root resorption using senolytics.

Zhou Y, Nishiura A, Morikuni H, Deng W, Tsujibayashi T, Momota Y Int J Oral Sci. 2023; 15(1):20.

PMID: 37253719 PMC: 10229558. DOI: 10.1038/s41368-023-00228-1.


Orthodontic Compression Enhances Macrophage M2 Polarization via Histone H3 Hyperacetylation.

Wang Y, Groeger S, Yong J, Ruf S Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(4).

PMID: 36834533 PMC: 9958841. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043117.


References
1.
Meikle M . The tissue, cellular, and molecular regulation of orthodontic tooth movement: 100 years after Carl Sandstedt. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 28(3):221-40. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl001. View

2.
Kaneda T, Miyauchi M, Takekoshi T, Kitagawa S, Kitagawa M, Shiba H . Characteristics of periodontal ligament subpopulations obtained by sequential enzymatic digestion of rat molar periodontal ligament. Bone. 2005; 38(3):420-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.08.021. View

3.
Grzesik W, Kuzentsov S, Uzawa K, Mankani M, Robey P, Yamauchi M . Normal human cementum-derived cells: isolation, clonal expansion, and in vitro and in vivo characterization. J Bone Miner Res. 1998; 13(10):1547-54. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1547. View

4.
Kvam E . Scanning electron microscopy of tissue changes on the pressure surface of human premolars following tooth movement. Scand J Dent Res. 1972; 80(5):357-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1972.tb00303.x. View

5.
Fukushima H, Kajiya H, Takada K, Okamoto F, Okabe K . Expression and role of RANKL in periodontal ligament cells during physiological root-resorption in human deciduous teeth. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003; 111(4):346-52. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00051.x. View