» Articles » PMID: 22916169

Neural Correlates of Individual Performance Differences in Resolving Perceptual Conflict

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Aug 24
PMID 22916169
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Attentional mechanisms are a crucial prerequisite to organize behavior. Most situations may be characterized by a 'competition' between salient, but irrelevant stimuli and less salient, relevant stimuli. In such situations top-down and bottom-up mechanisms interact with each other. In the present fMRI study, we examined how interindividual differences in resolving situations of perceptual conflict are reflected in brain networks mediating attentional selection. Doing so, we employed a change detection task in which subjects had to detect luminance changes in the presence and absence of competing distractors. The results show that good performers presented increased activation in the orbitofrontal cortex (BA 11), anterior cingulate (BA 25), inferior parietal lobule (BA 40) and visual areas V2 and V3 but decreased activation in BA 39. This suggests that areas mediating top-down attentional control are stronger activated in this group. Increased activity in visual areas reflects distinct neuronal enhancement relating to selective attentional mechanisms in order to solve the perceptual conflict. Opposed to good performers, brain areas activated by poor performers comprised the left inferior parietal lobule (BA 39) and fronto-parietal and visual regions were continuously deactivated, suggesting that poor performers perceive stronger conflict than good performers. Moreover, the suppression of neural activation in visual areas might indicate a strategy of poor performers to inhibit the processing of the irrelevant non-target feature. These results indicate that high sensitivity in perceptual areas and increased attentional control led to less conflict in stimulus processing and consequently to higher performance in competitive attentional selection.

Citing Articles

Working Memory Recovery in Adolescents with Concussion: Longitudinal fMRI Study.

Manelis A, Lima Santos J, Suss S, Holland C, Perry C, Hickey R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38930114 PMC: 11204632. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123585.


An Action-Independent Role for Midfrontal Theta Activity Prior to Error Commission.

Estiveira J, Dias C, Costa D, Castelhano J, Castelo-Branco M, Sousa T Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:805080.

PMID: 35634213 PMC: 9131421. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.805080.


Resting theta activity is associated with specific coding levels in event-related theta activity during conflict monitoring.

Pscherer C, Bluschke A, Prochnow A, Eggert E, Muckschel M, Beste C Hum Brain Mapp. 2020; 41(18):5114-5127.

PMID: 32822109 PMC: 7670648. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25178.


The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual-attentional conflicts during auditory processing.

Adelhofer N, Gohil K, Passow S, Teufert B, Roessner V, Li S Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39(12):5050-5061.

PMID: 30133058 PMC: 6866405. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24344.


The effect of feature-based attention on flanker interference processing: An fMRI-constrained source analysis.

Siemann J, Herrmann M, Galashan D Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):1580.

PMID: 29371681 PMC: 5785471. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20049-1.


References
1.
Rolls E . The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex. Brain Cogn. 2004; 55(1):11-29. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00277-X. View

2.
Rossi A, Pessoa L, Desimone R, Ungerleider L . The prefrontal cortex and the executive control of attention. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 192(3):489-97. PMC: 2752881. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1642-z. View

3.
Gilbert C, Sigman M . Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron. 2007; 54(5):677-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.019. View

4.
Corbetta M, Kincade J, Ollinger J, McAvoy M, Shulman G . Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(3):292-7. DOI: 10.1038/73009. View

5.
Devinsky O, Morrell M, Vogt B . Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain. 1995; 118 ( Pt 1):279-306. DOI: 10.1093/brain/118.1.279. View