» Articles » PMID: 22915779

Evaluation of Beam Hardening and Photon Scatter by Brass Compensator for IMRT

Overview
Journal J Radiat Res
Date 2012 Aug 24
PMID 22915779
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When a brass compensator is set in a treatment beam, beam hardening may take place. This variation of the energy spectrum may affect the accuracy of dose calculation by a treatment planning system and the results of dose measurement of brass compensator intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In addition, when X-rays pass the compensator, scattered photons are generated within the compensator. Scattered photons may affect the monitor unit (MU) calculation. In this study, to evaluate the variation of dose distribution by the compensator, dose distribution was measured and energy spectrum was simulated using the Monte Carlo method. To investigate the influence of beam hardening for dose measurement using an ionization chamber, the beam quality correction factor was determined. Moreover, to clarify the effect of scattered photons generated within the compensator for the MU calculation, the head scatter factor was measured and energy spectrum analyses were performed. As a result, when X-rays passed the brass compensator, beam hardening occurred and dose distribution was varied. The variation of dose distribution and energy spectrum was larger with decreasing field size. This means that energy spectrum should be reproduced correctly to obtain high accuracy of dose calculation for the compensator IMRT. On the other hand, the influence of beam hardening on k(Q) was insignificant. Furthermore, scattered photons were generated within the compensator, and scattered photons affect the head scatter factor. These results show that scattered photons must be taken into account for MU calculation for brass compensator IMRT.

Citing Articles

Optimization of Clarkson's Method for Calculating Absorbed Dose under Compensator Filters used in Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy.

M P, A H, M T E, K G J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020; 10(5):575-582.

PMID: 33134216 PMC: 7557464. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.858.


Quantitative analysis of brass compensators for commissioning of the Pinnacle planning system for IMRT.

Gates L, Gladstone D J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015; 16(6):130–138.

PMID: 26699564 PMC: 5690995. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5531.

References
1.
Chang S, Cullip T, Deschesne K . Intensity modulation delivery techniques: "step & shoot" MLC auto-sequence versus the use of a modulator. Med Phys. 2000; 27(5):948-59. DOI: 10.1118/1.598989. View

2.
Malamut C, Rogers D, Bielajew A . Calculation of water/air stopping-power ratios using EGS4 with explicit treatment of electron-positron differences. Med Phys. 1991; 18(6):1222-8. DOI: 10.1118/1.596594. View

3.
Zhu T, Ahnesjo A, Lam K, Li X, Charlie Ma C, Palta J . Report of AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group 74: in-air output ratio, Sc, for megavoltage photon beams. Med Phys. 2009; 36(11):5261-91. DOI: 10.1118/1.3227367. View

4.
LoSasso T, Chui C, Ling C . Comprehensive quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy with a multileaf collimator used in the dynamic mode. Med Phys. 2002; 28(11):2209-19. DOI: 10.1118/1.1410123. View

5.
Fujita Y, Tohyama N, Myojoyama A, Saitoh H . Depth scaling of solid phantom for intensity modulated radiotherapy beams. J Radiat Res. 2010; 51(6):707-13. DOI: 10.1269/jrr.10058. View