[¹⁸F]FDG-PET is Superior to [¹²³I]IBZM-SPECT for the Differential Diagnosis of Parkinsonism
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Imaging of regional cerebral glucose metabolism with PET and striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptors (D2R) with SPECT improves the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. We prospectively investigated 1) the diagnostic merits of these approaches in differentiating between Lewy body diseases (LBD; majority Parkinson disease [PD]) and atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS); 2) the diagnostic value of [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET to differentiate among APS subgroups.
Methods: Ninety-five of 107 consecutive patients with clinically suspected APS referred for imaging were recruited. [¹⁸F]FDG-PET scans were analyzed by visual assessment (including individual voxel-based statistical maps). Based on a priori defined disease-specific patterns, patients with putative APS were differentiated from LBD (first level) and allocated to the subgroups multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), or corticobasal degeneration (CBD) (second level). [¹²³I] iodobenzamide (IBZM)-SPECT datasets were subjected to an observer-independent regions-of-interest analysis to assess striatal D2R availability. Movement disorder specialists made final clinical diagnoses after a median follow-up time of 12 months.
Results: Seventy-eight patients with clinically verified APS (n = 44) or LBD (n = 34) were included in the statistical analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for discrimination between APS and LBD was significantly larger for [¹⁸F]FDG-PET (0.94) than for [¹²³I]IBZM-SPECT (0.74; p = 0.0006). Sensitivity/specificity of [¹⁸F]FDG-PET for diagnosing APS was 86%/91%, respectively. Sensitivity/specificity of [¹⁸F]FDG-PET in identifying APS subgroups was 77%/97% for MSA, 74%/95% for PSP, and 75%/92% for CBD.
Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of [¹⁸F]FDG-PET for discriminating LBD from APS is considerably higher than for [¹²³I]IBZM-SPECT. [¹⁸F]FDG-PET reliably differentiates APS subgroups.
PET, SPECT, and MRI imaging for evaluation of Parkinson's disease.
Gujral J, Gandhi O, Singh S, Ahmed M, Ayubcha C, Werner T Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; 14(6):371-390.
PMID: 39840378 PMC: 11744359. DOI: 10.62347/AICM8774.
Kaewchur T, Khiewvan B, Chamroonrat W, Lolekha P, Phokaewvarangkul O, Thientunyakit T Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 2024; 12(2):86-107.
PMID: 39050239 PMC: 11263770. DOI: 10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.75619.1531.
Diagnostic accuracy of cerebral [F]FDG PET in atypical parkinsonism.
Houssein N, Henriksen A, Hejl A, Marner L EJNMMI Res. 2023; 13(1):74.
PMID: 37572162 PMC: 10423182. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01025-x.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Nuclear Imaging of Parkinsonian Disorders: Where do we go from here?.
Savoie F, Arpin D, Vaillancourt D Curr Neuropharmacol. 2023; 22(10):1583-1605.
PMID: 37533246 PMC: 11284713. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X21666230801140648.
Differences in Striatal Metabolism in [F]FDG PET in Parkinson's Disease and Atypical Parkinsonism.
Seiffert A, Gomez-Grande A, Alonso-Gomez L, Mendez-Guerrero A, Villarejo-Galende A, Gomez E Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(1).
PMID: 36611298 PMC: 9818161. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010006.