» Articles » PMID: 22913820

Acute Management and Outcome of Multiple Trauma Patients with Pelvic Disruptions

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2012 Aug 24
PMID 22913820
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Data on prehospital and trauma-room fluid management of multiple trauma patients with pelvic disruptions are rarely reported. Present trauma algorithms recommend early hemorrhage control and massive fluid resuscitation. By matching the German Pelvic Injury Register (PIR) with the TraumaRegister DGU (TR) for the first time, we attempt to assess the initial fluid management for different Tile/OTA types of pelvic-ring fractures. Special attention was given to the patient's posttraumatic course, particularly intensive care unit (ICU) data and patient outcome.

Methods: A specific match code was applied to identify certain patients with pelvic disruptions from both PIR and TR anonymous trauma databases, admitted between 2004 and 2009. From the resulting intersection set, a retrospective analysis was done of prehospital and trauma-room data, length of ICU stay, days of ventilation, incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), sepsis, and mortality.

Results: In total, 402 patients were identified. Mean ISS was 25.9 points, and the mean of patients with ISS ≥ 16 was 85.6%. The fracture distribution was as follows: 19.7% type A, 29.4% type B, 36.6% type C, and 14.3% isolated acetabular and/or sacrum fractures. The type B/C, compared with type A fractures, were related to constantly worse vital signs that necessitated a higher volume of fluid and blood administration in the prehospital and/or the trauma-room setting. This group of B/C fractures were also related to a significantly higher presence of concomitant injuries and related to increased ISS. This was related to increased ventilation and ICU stay, increased rate of MODS, sepsis, and increased rate of mortality, at least for the type C fractures. Approximately 80% of the dead had sustained type B/C fractures.

Conclusions: The present study confirms the actuality of traditional trauma algorithms with initial massive fluid resuscitation in the recent therapy of multiple trauma patients with pelvic disruptions. Low-volume resuscitation seems not yet to be accepted in practice in managing this special patient entity. Mechanically unstable pelvic-ring fractures type B/C (according to the Tile/OTA classification) form a distinct entity that must be considered notably in future trauma algorithms.

Citing Articles

Traumatic lumbosacral instability: part 1 - proposing a definition and identifying underlying injury patterns.

Lindtner R, Krappinger D, Lindahl J, Bellabarba C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 145(1):37.

PMID: 39666023 PMC: 11638309. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05604-y.


Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Bleeding Related to Pelvic Trauma: Comparison of Technical and Clinical Results between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients.

Minici R, Mercurio M, Guzzardi G, Venturini M, Fontana F, Brunese L Tomography. 2023; 9(5):1660-1682.

PMID: 37736986 PMC: 10514840. DOI: 10.3390/tomography9050133.


Epidemiology of posterior urethral injury among adults with traumatic pelvic ring disruptions: a 10-year retrospective review from a trauma care centre in Southeast Nigeria.

Nnabugwu I, Obadaseraye O, Anyimba S, Nnabugwu C, Anikwe O Pan Afr Med J. 2023; 45:43.

PMID: 37575524 PMC: 10422031. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.43.34603.


[Comparison of planimetric CT‑based volumetry with simplified models for determining the size of intrapelvic hematomas due to pelvic fractures in emergency room diagnostics].

Moller S, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Emami A, Langheinrich A, Sehmisch S, Hoffmann R Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023; 127(2):126-134.

PMID: 37306758 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-023-01324-x.


The clinical characteristics and management of paediatric pelvic fractures: a changing landscape based on skeletal maturity.

Lu V, Gowrishankar S, Arshad Z, Thahir A, Lenihan J, McDonald S Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022; 49(1):559-570.

PMID: 36190546 PMC: 9925612. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02108-5.


References
1.
Gustavo Parreira J, Coimbra R, Rasslan S, Oliveira A, Fregoneze M, Mercadante M . The role of associated injuries on outcome of blunt trauma patients sustaining pelvic fractures. Injury. 2000; 31(9):677-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00074-7. View

2.
Cothren C, Osborn P, Moore E, Morgan S, Johnson J, Smith W . Preperitonal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a paradigm shift. J Trauma. 2007; 62(4):834-9. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31803c7632. View

3.
Osborn P, Smith W, Moore E, Cothren C, Morgan S, Williams A . Direct retroperitoneal pelvic packing versus pelvic angiography: A comparison of two management protocols for haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Injury. 2008; 40(1):54-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.038. View

4.
Revell M, Porter K, Greaves I . Fluid resuscitation in prehospital trauma care: a consensus view. Emerg Med J. 2002; 19(6):494-8. PMC: 1756310. DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.6.494. View

5.
Kwan I, Bunn F, Roberts I . Timing and volume of fluid administration for patients with bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (3):CD002245. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002245. View