» Articles » PMID: 22870954

Ligand Affinity and Kinase Activity Are Independent of Bacterial Chemotaxis Receptor Concentration: Insight into Signaling Mechanisms

Overview
Journal Biochemistry
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2012 Aug 9
PMID 22870954
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Binding of attractant to bacterial chemotaxis receptors initiates a transmembrane signal that inhibits the kinase CheA bound ~300 Å distant at the other end of the receptor. Chemoreceptors form large clusters in many bacterial species, and the extent of clustering has been reported to vary with signaling state. To test whether ligand binding regulates kinase activity by modulating a clustering equilibrium, we measured the effects of two-dimensional receptor concentration on kinase activity in proteoliposomes containing the purified Escherichia coli serine receptor reconstituted into vesicles over a range of lipid:protein molar ratios. The IC(50) of kinase inhibition was unchanged despite a 10-fold change in receptor concentration. Such a change in concentration would have produced a measurable shift in the IC(50) if receptor clustering were involved in kinase regulation, based on a simple model in which the receptor oligomerization and ligand binding equilibria are coupled. These results indicate that the primary signal, ligand control of kinase activity, does not involve a change in receptor oligomerization state. In combination with previous work on cytoplasmic fragments assembled on vesicle surfaces [Besschetnova, T. Y., et al. (2008) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105, 12289-12294], this suggests that binding of ligand to chemotaxis receptors inhibits the kinase by inducing a conformational change that expands the membrane area occupied by the receptor cytoplasmic domain, without changing the number of associated receptors in the signaling complex.

Citing Articles

Regulation of the chemotaxis histidine kinase CheA: A structural perspective.

Muok A, Briegel A, Crane B Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2019; 1862(1):183030.

PMID: 31374212 PMC: 7212787. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183030.


His-Tag-Mediated Dimerization of Chemoreceptors Leads to Assembly of Functional Nanoarrays.

Haglin E, Yang W, Briegel A, Thompson L Biochemistry. 2017; 56(44):5874-5885.

PMID: 28872847 PMC: 5678893. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00698.


Signaling-Related Mobility Changes in Bacterial Chemotaxis Receptors Revealed by Solid-State NMR.

Kashefi M, Thompson L J Phys Chem B. 2017; 121(37):8693-8705.

PMID: 28816463 PMC: 5613836. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06475.


Architecture and signal transduction mechanism of the bacterial chemosensory array: progress, controversies, and challenges.

Falke J, Piasta K Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014; 29:85-94.

PMID: 25460272 PMC: 4268382. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.10.001.


Hydrogen exchange differences between chemoreceptor signaling complexes localize to functionally important subdomains.

Koshy S, Li X, Eyles S, Weis R, Thompson L Biochemistry. 2014; 53(49):7755-64.

PMID: 25420045 PMC: 4270382. DOI: 10.1021/bi500657v.


References
1.
Shrout A, Montefusco D, Weis R . Template-directed assembly of receptor signaling complexes. Biochemistry. 2003; 42(46):13379-85. DOI: 10.1021/bi0352769. View

2.
Sourjik V, Berg H . Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 99(1):123-7. PMC: 117525. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.011589998. View

3.
Wuichet K, Zhulin I . Origins and diversification of a complex signal transduction system in prokaryotes. Sci Signal. 2010; 3(128):ra50. PMC: 3401578. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2000724. View

4.
Liu Y, LEVIT M, Lurz R, Surette M, Stock J . Receptor-mediated protein kinase activation and the mechanism of transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemotaxis. EMBO J. 1998; 16(24):7231-40. PMC: 1170323. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/16.24.7231. View

5.
Li M, Hazelbauer G . Cellular stoichiometry of the components of the chemotaxis signaling complex. J Bacteriol. 2004; 186(12):3687-94. PMC: 419939. DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3687-3694.2004. View