Why Do Patients Discontinue Fertility Treatment? A Systematic Review of Reasons and Predictors of Discontinuation in Fertility Treatment

Overview

Journal Hum Reprod Update

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2012 Aug 8

PMID 22869759

Citations 141

Authors

S Gameiro

J Boivin

L Peronace

C M Verhaak

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Chances of achieving parenthood are high for couples who undergo fertility treatment. However, many choose to discontinue before conceiving. A systematic review was conducted to investigate patients' stated reasons for and predictors of discontinuation at five fertility treatment stages. METHODS Six databases were systematically searched. Search-terms referred to fertility treatment and discontinuation. Studies reporting on patients' stated reasons for or predictors of treatment discontinuation were included. A list of all reasons for discontinuation presented in each study was made, different categories of reasons were defined and the percentage of selections of each category was calculated. For each predictor, it was noted how many studies investigated it and how many found a positive and/or negative association with discontinuation. RESULTS The review included 22 studies that sampled 21 453 patients from eight countries. The most selected reasons for discontinuation were: postponement of treatment (39.18%, postponement of treatment or unknown 19.17%), physical and psychological burden (19.07%, psychological burden 14%, physical burden 6.32%), relational and personal problems (16.67%, personal reasons 9.27%, relational problems 8.83%), treatment rejection (13.23%) and organizational (11.68%) and clinic (7.71%) problems. Some reasons were common across stages (e.g. psychological burden). Others were stage-specific (e.g. treatment rejection during workup). None of the predictors reported were consistently associated with discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Much longitudinal and theory led research is required to explain discontinuation. Meanwhile, treatment burden should be addressed by better care organization and support for patients. Patients should be well informed, have the opportunity to discuss values and worries about treatment and receive advice to decide about continuing treatment.

Citing Articles

A multicycle approach through DuoStim with a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol: a valuable option in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.

Vaiarelli A, Pittana E, Cimadomo D, Ruffa A, Colamaria S, Argento C J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 42(1):255-264.

PMID: 39538089 PMC: 11805732. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03317-0.

Identification of Psychological Symptom Clusters and Their Influencing Factors in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology in China: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Song D, Jiang W, Hu S, Zhu R, Pu C, Wang Y Int J Womens Health. 2024; 16:1493-1504.

PMID: 39281323 PMC: 11402353. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S468644.

Psychological aspects of infertility.

Wischmann T Med Genet. 2024; 36(3):171-177.

PMID: 39263650 PMC: 11388721. DOI: 10.1515/medgen-2024-2029.

The influence of assisted reproductive technologies-related stressors and social support on perceived stress and depression.

Gupta A, Lu E, Thayer Z BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):431.

PMID: 39068405 PMC: 11282751. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03262-1.

Anxiety in couples undergoing IVF: evidence from E-Freeze randomised controlled trial.

Li Y, McLeish J, Hardy P, Cole C, Carson C, Alderdice F Hum Reprod Open. 2024; 2024(3):hoae037.

PMID: 39055488 PMC: 11272172. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae037.

References

Callan V, Kloske B, Kashima Y, Hennessey J . Toward understanding women's decisions to continue or stop in vitro fertilization: the role of social, psychological, and background factors. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1988; 5(6):363-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01129572. View

Verhaak C, Smeenk J, Evers A, Kremer J, Kraaimaat F, Braat D . Women's emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 13(1):27-36. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dml040. View

Pinborg A, Hougaard C, Nyboe Andersen A, Molbo D, Schmidt L . Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(4):991-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den463. View

Durand M, Stiel M, Boivin J, Elwyn G . Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 71(1):125-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.12.004. View

Hammarberg K, Astbury J, Baker H . Women's experience of IVF: a follow-up study. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(2):374-83. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.2.374. View

Roest J, van Heusden A, ZEILMAKER G, Verhoeff A . Cumulative pregnancy rates and selective drop-out of patients in in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13(2):339-41. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.2.339. View

Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins J, Nygren K . International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(6):1506-12. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem046. View

Meijer A, Hamerlynck J . [Treatment results of donor insemination]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1980; 124(16):587-92. View

Witsenburg C, Dieben S, van der Westerlaken L, Verburg H, Naaktgeboren N . Cumulative live birth rates in cohorts of patients treated with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84(1):99-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.013. View

10.

Boivin J, Lancastle D . Medical waiting periods: imminence, emotions and coping. Womens Health (Lond). 2010; 6(1):59-69. DOI: 10.2217/whe.09.79. View

11.

Kelly J, Hughes C, Harrison R . The hidden costs of IVF. Ir Med J. 2006; 99(5):142-3. View

12.

Pook M, Krause W . Stress reduction in male infertility patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83(1):68-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.053. View

13.

Smeenk J, Verhaak C, Stolwijk A, Kremer J, Braat D . Reasons for dropout in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(2):262-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.027. View

14.

Brandes M, van der Steen J, Bokdam S, Hamilton C, de Bruin J, Nelen W . When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(12):3127-35. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep340. View

15.

Boden J . When IVF treatment fails. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2007; 10(2):93-8. DOI: 10.1080/14647270601142614. View

16.

Peddie V, van Teijlingen E, Bhattacharya S . Ending in-vitro fertilization: women's perception's of decision making. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2005; 7(1):31-7. DOI: 10.1080/1464727042000198069. View

17.

Pelinck M, Vogel N, Arts E, Simons A, Heineman M, Hoek A . Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(9):2463-70. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem164. View

18.

Moura-Ramos M, Gameiro S, Canavarro M, Soares I . Assessing infertility stress: re-examining the factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory. Hum Reprod. 2011; 27(2):496-505. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der388. View

19.

Verhagen T, Dumoulin J, Evers J, Land J . What is the most accurate estimate of pregnancy rates in IVF dropouts?. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(8):1793-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den209. View

20.

Verhaak C, Smeenk J, Evers A, van Minnen A, Kremer J, Kraaimaat F . Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: a prospective study. J Behav Med. 2005; 28(2):181-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-005-3667-0. View