Benign Colonic (18)F-FDG Uptake on Whole-Body FDG-PET Scan
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Gideonse B, Birkeland M, Vilstrup M, Grupe P, Naghavi-Behzad M, Ruhlmann C Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 42(7):753-764.
PMID: 38504000 PMC: 11217074. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01554-y.
Lesion Location in Clinical Significance of Incidental Colorectal FDG Uptake.
Lee J, Hartnett G, Kumar A Clin Endosc. 2012; 45(4):451-2.
PMID: 23251900 PMC: 3521954. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2012.45.4.451.
References
1.
Patrikeos A, Mackay J, Hicks R
. Detection of synchronous adenocarcinomas and multiple dysplastic polyps with F-18 FDG positron emission tomography in a case of nonfamilial polyposis. Clin Nucl Med. 2003; 28(6):487-8.
DOI: 10.1097/01.RLU.0000067510.43457.52.
View
2.
Cook G, Fogelman I, Maisey M
. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. Semin Nucl Med. 1996; 26(4):308-14.
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(96)80006-7.
View
3.
Roh S, Jung S, Kim S, Kim H, Lee M, Tae C
. The Clinical Meaning of Benign Colon Uptake in (18)F-FDG PET: Comparison with Colonoscopic Findings. Clin Endosc. 2012; 45(2):145-50.
PMC: 3401618.
DOI: 10.5946/ce.2012.45.2.145.
View
4.
Strauss L, Klippel S, Pan L, Schonleben K, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
. Assessment of quantitative FDG PET data in primary colorectal tumours: which parameters are important with respect to tumour detection?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34(6):868-77.
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0319-8.
View
5.
Drenth J, Nagengast F, Oyen W
. Evaluation of (pre-)malignant colonic abnormalities: endoscopic validation of FDG-PET findings. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001; 28(12):1766-9.
DOI: 10.1007/s002590100645.
View