» Articles » PMID: 22862909

Outcomes of Vitrified Early Cleavage-stage and Blastocyst-stage Embryos in a Cryopreservation Program: Evaluation of 3,150 Warming Cycles

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2012 Aug 7
PMID 22862909
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the outcomes achieved after Cryotop vitrification of both early cleavage and blastocyst-stage embryos and to determine whether the embryo developmental stage and embryo quality as well as the origin of the embryos (ovum donation cycles, patients' own oocytes) and the endometrial preparation for the embryo transfer had any effect on the final outcome.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Private university-affiliated IVF center.

Patient(s): Women undergoing 3,150 warming cycles whose embryos were vitrified due to various reasons.

Intervention(s): Vitrification by the Cryotop open device.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Delivery rate (DR) per warming cycle.

Result(s): Survival rate was 95% (5,722 out of 6,019 embryos). The percentage of intact embryos at warming showing 100% blastomere survival was 93% (95% CI 90.1%-95.3%) for day 2 and 95% (95% CI 94.3%-95.7%) for day 3; 3,057 embryo transfers were performed (3% cancellation rate). The DR/warming cycle was 32.5% (95% CI 30.9%-34.2%). Slight differences in survival rate were found [94.9% (95% CI 93.0%-96.8%) for day 2, 94.2% (95% CI 93.4%-94.9%) for day 3, 95.7% (95% CI 94.5%-96.9%) for day 5, and 97.6% (95% CI 96.9%-98.6%) for day 6]. Overall implantation, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates per warming cycle were 35.5% (95% CI 33.5%-38.5%), 41.7% (95% CI 39.9%-43.4%), 32.6% (95% CI 31.0%-34.2%), and 38.1% (95% CI 36.4%-39.8%) respectively. The linear regression model considering embryo developmental stage, ovum donation or patient's own oocytes, and hormonal replacement therapy or natural cycle for endometrial preparation (odds ratio 1.179; 95% CI 0.912-1.277) showed no impact on the DR.

Conclusion(s): Highly successful cryopreservation of all embryo developmental stages is possible with the use of the Cryotop system. There are no variables clearly exerting a negative effect on the survival and delivery rates.

Citing Articles

Embryo vitrification impacts learning and spatial memory by altering the imprinting genes expression level in the mouse offspring' hippocampus.

Hosseini S, Hosseini S, Aligholi H, Salehi M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5419.

PMID: 39948414 PMC: 11825692. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89857-6.


Global research trends in endometrial receptivity from 2000 to 2024: bibliometric analysis.

Liu Z, Zhang Z, Xie P Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1465893.

PMID: 39540052 PMC: 11558532. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1465893.


Two-year cumulative live-birth rates and maximum number of transfer cycles in women aged ≥ 40 years.

Nukaga S, Tokoro M, Asano E, Inoue D, Hashiba Y, Fukunaga N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24814.

PMID: 39438490 PMC: 11496526. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74460-y.


The effect of male factors on embryo morphokinetics: a retrospective analysis of 2726 blastocysts.

Pellegrini L, Gatti S, Navarro N, Hervas I, Marcos M, Viviana V J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(12):3467-3475.

PMID: 39370476 PMC: 11707112. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03275-7.


Live Birth after Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Mahmoudinia M, Sovizi B, Ebadi S, Zakerinasab F, Sadeghi T, Mahmoudinia M Int J Fertil Steril. 2024; 18(Suppl 1):10-16.

PMID: 39033365 PMC: 11263845. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.2000574.1463.