» Articles » PMID: 22836174

Quantitative Mouse Brain Phenotyping Based on Single and Multispectral MR Protocols

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Jul 28
PMID 22836174
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sophisticated image analysis methods have been developed for the human brain, but such tools still need to be adapted and optimized for quantitative small animal imaging. We propose a framework for quantitative anatomical phenotyping in mouse models of neurological and psychiatric conditions. The framework encompasses an atlas space, image acquisition protocols, and software tools to register images into this space. We show that a suite of segmentation tools (Avants, Epstein et al., 2008) designed for human neuroimaging can be incorporated into a pipeline for segmenting mouse brain images acquired with multispectral magnetic resonance imaging (MR) protocols. We present a flexible approach for segmenting such hyperimages, optimizing registration, and identifying optimal combinations of image channels for particular structures. Brain imaging with T1, T2* and T2 contrasts yielded accuracy in the range of 83% for hippocampus and caudate putamen (Hc and CPu), but only 54% in white matter tracts, and 44% for the ventricles. The addition of diffusion tensor parameter images improved accuracy for large gray matter structures (by >5%), white matter (10%), and ventricles (15%). The use of Markov random field segmentation further improved overall accuracy in the C57BL/6 strain by 6%; so Dice coefficients for Hc and CPu reached 93%, for white matter 79%, for ventricles 68%, and for substantia nigra 80%. We demonstrate the segmentation pipeline for the widely used C57BL/6 strain, and two test strains (BXD29, APP/TTA). This approach appears promising for characterizing temporal changes in mouse models of human neurological and psychiatric conditions, and may provide anatomical constraints for other preclinical imaging, e.g. fMRI and molecular imaging. This is the first demonstration that multiple MR imaging modalities combined with multivariate segmentation methods lead to significant improvements in anatomical segmentation in the mouse brain.

Citing Articles

The impact of HCN4 channels on CNS brain networks as a new target in pain development.

Hafele M, Kreitz S, Ludwig A, Hess A, Wank I Front Netw Physiol. 2023; 3:1090502.

PMID: 37496803 PMC: 10368246. DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2023.1090502.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Animal Models of Alzheimer's Disease Amyloidosis.

Ni R Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(23).

PMID: 34884573 PMC: 8657987. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312768.


A multicontrast MR atlas of the Wistar rat brain.

Johnson G, Laoprasert R, Anderson R, Cofer G, Cook J, Pratson F Neuroimage. 2021; 242:118470.

PMID: 34391877 PMC: 8754086. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118470.


Innovative MRI Techniques in Neuroimaging Approaches for Cerebrovascular Diseases and Vascular Cognitive Impairment.

Carnevale L, Lembo G Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(11).

PMID: 31151154 PMC: 6600149. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20112656.


Volumes of brain structures in captive wild-type and laboratory rats: 7T magnetic resonance in vivo automatic atlas-based study.

Welniak-Kaminska M, Fiedorowicz M, Orzel J, Bogorodzki P, Modlinska K, Stryjek R PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0215348.

PMID: 30973956 PMC: 6459519. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215348.


References
1.
Dazai J, Spring S, Cahill L, Henkelman R . Multiple-mouse neuroanatomical magnetic resonance imaging. J Vis Exp. 2011; (48). PMC: 3339839. DOI: 10.3791/2497. View

2.
Bai J, Trinh T, Chuang K, Qiu A . Atlas-based automatic mouse brain image segmentation revisited: model complexity vs. image registration. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(6):789-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.010. View

3.
MacKenzie-Graham A, Tinsley M, Shah K, Aguilar C, Strickland L, Boline J . Cerebellar cortical atrophy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Neuroimage. 2006; 32(3):1016-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.006. View

4.
Yushkevich P, Piven J, Hazlett H, Smith R, Ho S, Gee J . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(3):1116-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015. View

5.
Bohland J, Wu C, Barbas H, Bokil H, Bota M, Breiter H . A proposal for a coordinated effort for the determination of brainwide neuroanatomical connectivity in model organisms at a mesoscopic scale. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009; 5(3):e1000334. PMC: 2655718. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000334. View