Interobserver Variation in Clinical Target Volume and Organs at Risk Segmentation in Post-parotidectomy Radiotherapy: Can Segmentation Protocols Help?

Overview

Journal Br J Radiol

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Radiology

Date 2012 Jul 21

PMID 22815423

Citations 30

Authors

M Mukesh

R Benson

R Jena

A Hoole

T Roques

C Scrase

C Martin

G A Whitfield

J Gemmill

S Jefferies

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: A study of interobserver variation in the segmentation of the post-operative clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) for parotid tumours was undertaken. The segmentation exercise was performed as a baseline, and repeated after 3 months using a segmentation protocol to assess whether CTV conformity improved.

Methods: Four head and neck oncologists independently segmented CTVs and OARs (contralateral parotid, spinal cord and brain stem) on CT data sets of five patients post parotidectomy. For each CTV or OAR delineation, total volume was calculated. The conformity level (CL) between different clinicians' outlines was measured using a validated outline analysis tool. The data for CTVs were re-analysed after using the cochlear sparing therapy and conventional radiation segmentation protocol.

Results: Significant differences in CTV morphology were observed at baseline, yielding a mean CL of 30% (range 25-39%). The CL improved after using the segmentation protocol with a mean CL of 54% (range 50-65%). For OARs, the mean CL was 60% (range 53-68%) for the contralateral parotid gland, 23% (range 13-27%) for the brain stem and 25% (range 22-31%) for the spinal cord.

Conclusions: There was low conformity for CTVs and OARs between different clinicians. The CL for CTVs improved with use of a segmentation protocol, but the CLs remained lower than expected. This study supports the need for clear guidelines for segmentation of target and OARs to compare and interpret the results of head and neck cancer radiation studies.

Citing Articles

Generalizability, robustness, and correction bias of segmentations of thoracic organs at risk in CT images.

Guerendel C, Petrychenko L, Chupetlovska K, Bodalal Z, Beets-Tan R, Benson S Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39738559 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11321-2.

An effective and open source interactive 3D medical image segmentation solution.

Gao Y, Chen X, Yang Q, Lasso A, Kolesov I, Pieper S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29878.

PMID: 39622975 PMC: 11612195. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80206-7.

Swin Transformer-based automatic delineation of the hippocampus by MRI in hippocampus-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy.

Li L, Lu Z, Jiang A, Sha G, Luo Z, Xie X Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1441791.

PMID: 39464425 PMC: 11502472. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1441791.

An improved 3D-UNet-based brain hippocampus segmentation model based on MR images.

Yang Q, Wang C, Pan K, Xia B, Xie R, Shi J BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):166.

PMID: 38970025 PMC: 11225132. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01346-w.

A Review of Artificial Intelligence Application for Radiotherapy.

Shan G, Yu S, Lai Z, Xuan Z, Zhang J, Wang B Dose Response. 2024; 22(2):15593258241263687.

PMID: 38912333 PMC: 11193352. DOI: 10.1177/15593258241263687.

References

Kouwenhoven E, Giezen M, Struikmans H . Measuring the similarity of target volume delineations independent of the number of observers. Phys Med Biol. 2009; 54(9):2863-73. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/018. View

Fiorino C, Reni M, Bolognesi A, Cattaneo G, Calandrino R . Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning. Radiother Oncol. 1998; 47(3):285-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00021-8. View

Stroom J, Heijmen B . Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report. Radiother Oncol. 2002; 64(1):75-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00140-8. View

Giraud P, Elles S, Helfre S, De Rycke Y, Servois V, Carette M . Conformal radiotherapy for lung cancer: different delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) by radiologists and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol. 2002; 62(1):27-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00444-3. View

Tai P, Van Dyk J, Battista J, Yu E, Stitt L, Tonita J . Improving the consistency in cervical esophageal target volume definition by special training. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 53(3):766-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02752-9. View

van de Water T, Bijl H, Westerlaan H, Langendijk J . Delineation guidelines for organs at risk involved in radiation-induced salivary dysfunction and xerostomia. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 93(3):545-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.008. View

El-Bassiouni M, Ciernik I, Bernard Davis J, El-Attar I, Reiner B, Burger C . [18FDG] PET-CT-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69(1):286-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.053. View

Mitchell D, Perry L, Smith S, Elliott T, Wylie J, Cowan R . Assessing the effect of a contouring protocol on postprostatectomy radiotherapy clinical target volumes and interphysician variation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75(4):990-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.042. View

Chao K, Bhide S, Chen H, Asper J, Bush S, Franklin G . Reduce in variation and improve efficiency of target volume delineation by a computer-assisted system using a deformable image registration approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 68(5):1512-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.037. View

10.

Geets X, Daisne J, Arcangeli S, Coche E, De Poel M, Duprez T . Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord: comparison between CT-scan and MRI. Radiother Oncol. 2005; 77(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.04.010. View

11.

Mayo C, Yorke E, Merchant T . Radiation associated brainstem injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76(3 Suppl):S36-41. PMC: 2899702. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.078. View

12.

Daisne J, Duprez T, Weynand B, Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H . Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology. 2004; 233(1):93-100. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2331030660. View

13.

Wang D, Schultz C, Jursinic P, Bialkowski M, Zhu X, Brown W . Initial experience of FDG-PET/CT guided IMRT of head-and-neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65(1):143-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.048. View

14.

van Baardwijk A, Bosmans G, Boersma L, Buijsen J, Wanders S, Hochstenbag M . PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 68(3):771-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.067. View

15.

Hermans R, Feron M, Bellon E, Dupont P, Van Den Bogaert W, Baert A . Laryngeal tumor volume measurements determined with CT: a study on intra- and interobserver variability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 40(3):553-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00853-5. View

16.

Rasch C, Eisbruch A, Remeijer P, Bos L, Hoogeman M, Van Herk M . Irradiation of paranasal sinus tumors, a delineation and dose comparison study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 52(1):120-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01751-5. View

17.

Yamamoto M, Nagata Y, Okajima K, Ishigaki T, Murata R, Mizowaki T . Differences in target outline delineation from CT scans of brain tumours using different methods and different observers. Radiother Oncol. 1999; 50(2):151-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00015-8. View

18.

Saarnak A, Boersma M, van Bunningen B, Wolterink R, Steggerda M . Inter-observer variation in delineation of bladder and rectum contours for brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2000; 56(1):37-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00185-7. View

19.

Gregoire V, Eisbruch A, Hamoir M, Levendag P . Proposal for the delineation of the nodal CTV in the node-positive and the post-operative neck. Radiother Oncol. 2006; 79(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.03.009. View

20.

Paulino A, Koshy M, Howell R, Schuster D, Davis L . Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 61(5):1385-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.037. View