» Articles » PMID: 22815420

Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Relationship Between Fluorine-18 Fludeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography CT Maximum Standardised Uptake Value, Metabolic Tumour Volume, and Tumour, Node and Metastasis Classification

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Jul 21
PMID 22815420
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the relationships between primary tumour, maximum standardised uptake value, metabolic tumour volume and seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients.

Methods: Fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scans of 41 consecutive newly diagnosed OSCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) and metabolic tumour volume (MTV) were recorded. Two-tailed Spearman's correlation was used to analyse the relationships between the metabolic parameters and the AJCC staging system.

Results: Positive correlations were observed between SUV(max), MTV and tumour (T) stage, in addition to node (N) stage and AJCC stage. Both metabolic parameters were independent variables that significantly affected the N stage and AJCC stage, and SUV(max) was the only independent variable that significantly affected the T stage.

Conclusion: The metabolic parameters derived from (18)F-FDG PET-CT were positively correlated with T, N and AJCC stage in primary OSCC. Our findings may suggest a complementary role of these parameters to seventh-edition AJCC staging in the prognostication of OSCC patients.

Citing Articles

FDG PET/CT and Endoscopic Ultrasound for Preoperative T-Staging of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Huang Y, Chiu N, Lu H, Chiu Y, Hsu C, Wang Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835827 PMC: 10572619. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193083.


Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Other Quantitative F-FDG PET/CT Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Esophageal Cancer.

Gopal A, Xi Y, Subramaniam R, Pinho D Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021; 3(1):e200022.

PMID: 33778756 PMC: 7983774. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020200022.


Queuine Micronutrient Deficiency Promotes Warburg Metabolism and Reversal of the Mitochondrial ATP Synthase in Hela Cells.

Hayes P, Fergus C, Ghanim M, Cirzi C, Burtnyak L, McGrenaghan C Nutrients. 2020; 12(3).

PMID: 32213952 PMC: 7146442. DOI: 10.3390/nu12030871.


FDG PET using SUV for preoperative T-staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Huang Y, Lu H, Huang S, Hsu C, Chiu N, Wang Y BMC Med Imaging. 2017; 17(1):1.

PMID: 28056868 PMC: 5217536. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0171-7.


Pre-Chemoradiotherapy FDG PET/CT cannot Identify Residual Metabolically-Active Volumes within Individual Esophageal Tumors.

Lu W, Tan S, Chen W, Kligerman S, Feigenberg S, Zhang H J Nucl Med Radiat Ther. 2015; 6(3).

PMID: 26594591 PMC: 4652953. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9619.1000226.


References
1.
Chua D, Sham J, Leung L, Tai K, Au G . Tumor volume is not an independent prognostic factor in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 58(5):1437-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.075. View

2.
Zhu W, Yu J, Sun X, Xie P, Kong L . Serum CYFRA21-1 as a prognostic marker for patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Biomarkers. 2010; 15(7):602-7. DOI: 10.3109/1354750X.2010.504309. View

3.
Hu Y, Hu C, Zhang H, Ping Y, Chen L . How does the number of resected lymph nodes influence TNM staging and prognosis for esophageal carcinoma?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 17(3):784-90. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0818-5. View

4.
Miller T, Grigsby P . Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 53(2):353-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02705-0. View

5.
Lee P, Weerasuriya D, Lavori P, Quon A, Hara W, Maxim P . Metabolic tumor burden predicts for disease progression and death in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69(2):328-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.036. View