» Articles » PMID: 15050321

Tumor Volume is Not an Independent Prognostic Factor in Early-stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated by Radiotherapy Alone

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2004 Mar 31
PMID 15050321
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the tumor volume can predict the treatment outcome in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by radiotherapy alone.

Methods And Materials: The pretreatment CT scans of 116 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I-II NPC treated by radiotherapy alone were retrospectively reviewed. The clinician outlined the tumor extent. The primary tumor volume (PTV) and nodal volume (NV) were then calculated by a summation-of-areas technique. The PTV and NV were correlated with locoregional control, distant failure, and survival. The median follow-up time was 105 months.

Results: Patients with Stage I disease had a 5-year locoregional control rate of 95% and a disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of 97%; for Stage II disease, the corresponding rates were 81% and 79%. The PTV ranged from 1.3 to 75.5 cm3 (median, 12.6 cm3), with substantial overlap between T1 and T2 disease. The NV ranged from 0 to 35.4 cm(3). Patients with a PTV >15 cm3 had significantly worse local control (5-year control rate, 82% vs. 93%; p = 0.033), but no statistically significant difference was noted in survival (5-year DSS rate, 83% vs. 89%; p = 0.30). The difference in local control was mainly seen in those with T2 disease. Patients with NV >4 cm3 had a greater distant failure rate (5-year distant metastasis-free rate, 72% vs. 90%; p = 0.011) and worse survival (5-year DSS rate, 76% vs. 94%; p = 0.0038). Nodal control was excellent with no difference between a NV of < or =4 cm3 and a NV of >4 cm3 (5-year control rate, 97% vs. 100%). The survival rate was worst in patients with a PTV >15 cm3 and a NV >4 cm3 (5-year DSS rate, 68%) and best in those with a PTV of < or =15 cm3 and a NV of < or =4 cm3 (5-year DSS rate, 92%). Multivariate analysis, however, showed that only parapharyngeal extension (T2b) and N1 stage were independent factors that predicted locoregional control and survival, and N1 stage was the only factor that predicted distant failure.

Conclusion: The pretreatment tumor volume has a limited prognostic value in early-stage NPC compared with the usual T and N classification, with Stage T2b and N1 as independent factors that predicted treatment outcome. Within T2 disease, the estimation of tumor volume may identify a subgroup of patients with a greater risk of local failure that warrants more aggressive treatment.

Citing Articles

The evolution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging.

Guo R, Mao Y, Tang L, Chen L, Sun Y, Ma J Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1102):20190244.

PMID: 31298937 PMC: 6774596. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190244.


Prognostic value of tumor burden in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Chen C, Fei Z, Huang C, Ding J, Chen L Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10:3169-3175.

PMID: 30214309 PMC: 6126477. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S169459.


Cervical nodal volume for prognostication and risk stratification of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and implications on the TNM-staging system.

Yuan H, Ai Q, Kwong D, Fong D, King A, Vardhanabhuti V Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):10387.

PMID: 28871162 PMC: 5583337. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10423-w.


Prognostic value of cervical nodal tumor volume in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Analysis of 1230 patients with positive cervical nodal metastasis.

Chen F, Zhou G, Qi Z, Lin L, Hu J, Wang X PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0176995.

PMID: 28489930 PMC: 5425204. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176995.


Prognostic value and predictive threshold of tumor volume for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

He Y, Wang Y, Cao P, Shen L, Zhao Y, Zhang Z Chin J Cancer. 2016; 35(1):96.

PMID: 27852284 PMC: 5112747. DOI: 10.1186/s40880-016-0159-2.