» Articles » PMID: 22812540

Perspective and Agency During Video Gaming Influences Spatial Presence Experience and Brain Activation Patterns

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2012 Jul 21
PMID 22812540
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The experience of spatial presence (SP), i.e., the sense of being present in a virtual environment, emerges if an individual perceives himself as 1) if he were actually located (self-location) and 2) able to act in the virtual environment (possible actions). In this study, two main media factors (perspective and agency) were investigated while participants played a commercially available video game.

Methods: The differences in SP experience and associated brain activation were compared between the conditions of game play in first person perspective (1PP) and third person perspective (3PP) as well as between agency, i.e., active navigation of the video game character (active), and non-agency, i.e., mere passive observation (passive). SP was assessed using standard questionnaires, and brain activation was measured using electroencephalography (EEG) and sLORETA source localisation (standard low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography).

Results: Higher SP ratings were obtained in the 1PP compared with the 3PP condition and in the active compared with the passive condition. On a neural level, we observed in the 1PP compared with the 3PP condition significantly less alpha band power in the parietal, the occipital and the limbic cortex. In the active compared with the passive condition, we uncovered significantly more theta band power in frontal brain regions.

Conclusion: We propose that manipulating the factors perspective and agency influences SP formation by either directly or indirectly modulating the ego-centric visual processing in a fronto-parietal network. The neuroscientific results are discussed in terms of the theoretical concepts of SP.

Citing Articles

Distributed Cognition and the Experience of Presence in the Mars Exploration Rover Mission.

Chiappe D, Vervaeke J Front Psychol. 2021; 12:689932.

PMID: 34234725 PMC: 8255671. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689932.


Stereoscopic Rendering Goggles Elicits Higher Functional Connectivity During Virtual Reality Gaming.

Forlim C, Bittner L, Mostajeran F, Steinicke F, Gallinat J, Kuhn S Front Hum Neurosci. 2019; 13:365.

PMID: 31708759 PMC: 6823517. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00365.


Neural Basis of Video Gaming: A Systematic Review.

Palaus M, Marron E, Viejo-Sobera R, Redolar-Ripoll D Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:248.

PMID: 28588464 PMC: 5438999. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00248.


The drive-wise project: driving simulator training increases real driving performance in healthy older drivers.

Casutt G, Theill N, Martin M, Keller M, Jancke L Front Aging Neurosci. 2014; 6:85.

PMID: 24860497 PMC: 4026721. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00085.


Kinesthetic and vestibular information modulate alpha activity during spatial navigation: a mobile EEG study.

Ehinger B, Fischer P, Gert A, Kaufhold L, Weber F, Pipa G Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:71.

PMID: 24616681 PMC: 3934489. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00071.


References
1.
Lehmann D . The view of an EEG-EP mapper. Brain Topogr. 1988; 1(2):77-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF01129171. View

2.
Larsson P, Vastfjall D, Kleiner M . The actor-observer effect in virtual reality presentations. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2001; 4(2):239-46. DOI: 10.1089/109493101300117929. View

3.
Haalman I, Vaadia E . Dynamics of neuronal interactions: relation to behavior, firing rates, and distance between neurons. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010; 5(4):249-53. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:4<249::AID-HBM8>3.0.CO;2-3. View

4.
Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Gonzalez Andino S, Lantz G, Michel C, Landis T . Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations. Brain Topogr. 2002; 14(2):131-7. DOI: 10.1023/a:1012944913650. View

5.
Jancke L, Cheetham M, Baumgartner T . Virtual reality and the role of the prefrontal cortex in adults and children. Front Neurosci. 2009; 3(1):52-9. PMC: 2695391. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.01.006.2009. View