Characterization of Telaprevir Treatment Outcomes and Resistance in Patients with Prior Treatment Failure: Results from the REALIZE Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Unlabelled: In the Phase 3 REALIZE study, 662 genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with prior peginterferon/ribavirin treatment failure (including relapsers, partial, and null responders) were randomized to 12 weeks of telaprevir given immediately (T12/PR48) or following 4 weeks of peginterferon/ribavirin (lead-in T12/PR48), or 12 weeks of placebo (PR48), combined with a total of 48 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 64% (T12/PR48), 66% (lead-in T12/PR48), and 17% (PR48). This analysis aimed to characterize treatment outcomes and viral variants emerging in telaprevir-treated patients not achieving SVR. HCV NS3·4A population sequencing was performed at baseline, during treatment, and follow-up. Telaprevir-resistant variants were classified into lower-level (3- to 25-fold 50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50) ] increase: V36A/M, T54A/S, R155I/K/M/T, and A156S) and higher-level (>25-fold IC(50) increase: V36M+R155K and A156T/V) resistance. Resistant variants were uncommon at baseline. Overall, 18% (52%, 19%, and 1% of prior null and partial responders and relapsers, respectively) of telaprevir-treated patients had on-treatment virologic failure, with no significant difference with or without a lead-in. Virologic failure during the telaprevir-treatment phase was predominantly associated with higher-level resistance; virologic failure during the peginterferon/ribavirin-treatment phase was associated with higher- or lower-level, or wildtype variants, depending on genotype. Relapse occurred in 9% of patients completing assigned treatment and was generally associated with lower-level resistant variants or wildtype. Resistant variants were no longer detectable by study end (median follow-up of 11 months) in 58% of non-SVR patients.
Conclusion: In REALIZE, variants emerging in non-SVR, telaprevir-treated patients were similar irrespective of the use of a lead-in and were consistent with those previously reported. In most patients, resistant variants became undetectable over time.
Era of direct acting anti-viral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C.
Ahmed M World J Hepatol. 2018; 10(10):670-684.
PMID: 30386460 PMC: 6206157. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i10.670.
Venugopal V, Padmanabhan P, Raja R, Dixit N PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(7):e1006335.
PMID: 30001324 PMC: 6057683. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006335.
Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.
Jakobsen J, Nielsen E, Feinberg J, Katakam K, Fobian K, Hauser G Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 9:CD012143.
PMID: 28922704 PMC: 6484376. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub3.
Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.
Jakobsen J, Nielsen E, Feinberg J, Katakam K, Fobian K, Hauser G Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6:CD012143.
PMID: 28585310 PMC: 6484383. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub2.
Silymarin/Silybin and Chronic Liver Disease: A Marriage of Many Years.
Federico A, Dallio M, Loguercio C Molecules. 2017; 22(2).
PMID: 28125040 PMC: 6155865. DOI: 10.3390/molecules22020191.