» Articles » PMID: 22798213

Cervical Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Interventions for Racial and Ethnic Minorities: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2012 Jul 17
PMID 22798213
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review the literature to determine which interventions improve the screening, diagnosis or treatment of cervical cancer for racial and/or ethnic minorities.

Data Sources: Medline on OVID, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Systematic Reviews.

Study Eligibility Criteria, Participants And Interventions: We searched the above databases for original articles published in English with at least one intervention designed to improve cervical cancer prevention, screening, diagnosis or treatment that linked participants to the healthcare system; that focused on US racial and/or ethnic minority populations; and that measured health outcomes. Articles were reviewed to determine the population, intervention(s), and outcomes. Articles published through August 2010 were included.

Study Appraisal And Synthesis Methods: One author rated the methodological quality of each of the included articles. The strength of evidence was assessed using the criteria developed by the GRADE Working Group.

Results: Thirty-one studies were included. The strength of evidence is moderate that telephone support with navigation increases the rate of screening for cervical cancer in Spanish- and English-speaking populations; low that education delivered by lay health educators with navigation increases the rate of screening for cervical cancer for Latinas, Chinese Americans and Vietnamese Americans; low that a single visit for screening for cervical cancer and follow up of an abnormal result improves the diagnosis and treatment of premalignant disease of the cervix for Latinas; and low that telephone counseling increases the diagnosis and treatment of premalignant lesions of the cervix for African Americans.

Limitations: Studies that did not focus on racial and/or ethnic minority populations may have been excluded. In addition, this review excluded interventions that did not link racial and ethnic minorities to the health care system. While inclusion of these studies may have altered our findings, they were outside the scope of our review.

Conclusions And Implications Of Key Findings: Patient navigation with telephone support or education may be effective at improving screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minorities. Research is needed to determine the applicability of the findings beyond the populations studied.

Citing Articles

Bridging the Gap: Interventions to Increase Cancer Screening Adherence in Individuals with Mental Disorders-A Systematic Review.

Lombardo P, Mussetto I, Baccolini V, Di Rosa E, Sinopoli A Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851851 PMC: 11761912. DOI: 10.3390/bs15010047.


A Proposed mHealth Intervention to Address Patient Barriers to Colposcopy Attendance: Qualitative Interview Study of Clinic Staff and Patient Perspectives.

Hemler J, Wagner R, Sullivan B, Macenat M, Tagai E, Vega J JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e55043.

PMID: 39808485 PMC: 11775484. DOI: 10.2196/55043.


A Systematic Review of Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Immigrant Vietnamese Women.

Hua J, Jackson K J Community Health. 2024; 50(1):187-198.

PMID: 39187725 PMC: 11805883. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01395-w.


Anti-racist interventions to reduce ethnic disparities in healthcare in the UK: an umbrella review and findings from healthcare, education and criminal justice.

Yip J, Poduval S, de Souza-Thomas L, Carter S, Fenton K BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e075711.

PMID: 38418232 PMC: 10910548. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075711.


Examining cancer screening disparities by race/ethnicity and insurance groups: A comparison of 2008 and 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data in the United States.

Sun J, Frick K, Liang H, Chow C, Aronowitz S, Shi L PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0290105.

PMID: 38416784 PMC: 10901319. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290105.


References
1.
Miller S, Siejak K, Schroeder C, Lerman C, Hernandez E, Helm C . Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89(10):703-8. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/89.10.703. View

2.
Fernandez M, Gonzales A, Tortolero-Luna G, Williams J, Saavedra-Embesi M, Chan W . Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(5):936-43. PMC: 2667857. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.136713. View

3.
Paskett E, Tatum C, DAgostino Jr R, Rushing J, Velez R, Michielutte R . Community-based interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening: results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8(5):453-9. View

4.
Jibaja-Weiss M, Volk R, Kingery P, Smith Q, Holcomb J . Tailored messages for breast and cervical cancer screening of low-income and minority women using medical records data. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 50(2):123-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00119-2. View

5.
Marcus A, Kaplan C, Crane L, Berek J, Bernstein G, Gunning J . Reducing loss-to-follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears. Results from a randomized trial testing an intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives. Med Care. 1998; 36(3):397-410. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199803000-00015. View