» Articles » PMID: 22792297

Bayesian Calibration of Simultaneity in Audiovisual Temporal Order Judgments

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jul 14
PMID 22792297
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

After repeated exposures to two successive audiovisual stimuli presented in one frequent order, participants eventually perceive a pair separated by some lag time in the same order as occurring simultaneously (lag adaptation). In contrast, we previously found that perceptual changes occurred in the opposite direction in response to tactile stimuli, conforming to bayesian integration theory (bayesian calibration). We further showed, in theory, that the effect of bayesian calibration cannot be observed when the lag adaptation was fully operational. This led to the hypothesis that bayesian calibration affects judgments regarding the order of audiovisual stimuli, but that this effect is concealed behind the lag adaptation mechanism. In the present study, we showed that lag adaptation is pitch-insensitive using two sounds at 1046 and 1480 Hz. This enabled us to cancel lag adaptation by associating one pitch with sound-first stimuli and the other with light-first stimuli. When we presented each type of stimulus (high- or low-tone) in a different block, the point of simultaneity shifted to "sound-first" for the pitch associated with sound-first stimuli, and to "light-first" for the pitch associated with light-first stimuli. These results are consistent with lag adaptation. In contrast, when we delivered each type of stimulus in a randomized order, the point of simultaneity shifted to "light-first" for the pitch associated with sound-first stimuli, and to "sound-first" for the pitch associated with light-first stimuli. The results clearly show that bayesian calibration is pitch-specific and is at work behind pitch-insensitive lag adaptation during temporal order judgment of audiovisual stimuli.

Citing Articles

No effect of spatial congruence on rapid temporal recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony.

Uno K, Hidaka S Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(4):1615-1626.

PMID: 38172423 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02441-9.


Weakened Bayesian Calibration for Tactile Temporal Order Judgment in Individuals with Higher Autistic Traits.

Wada M, Umesawa Y, Sano M, Tajima S, Kumagaya S, Miyazaki M J Autism Dev Disord. 2022; 53(1):378-389.

PMID: 35064873 PMC: 9889458. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05442-0.


Sub-optimality in motor planning is not improved by explicit observation of motor uncertainty.

Ota K, Shinya M, Maloney L, Kudo K Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):14850.

PMID: 31619756 PMC: 6795881. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50901-x.


Specificity of action selection modulates the perceived temporal order of action and sensory events.

Desantis A, Haggard P, Ikegaya Y, Hagura N Exp Brain Res. 2018; 236(8):2157-2164.

PMID: 29779051 PMC: 6061496. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5292-5.


Gravity as a Strong Prior: Implications for Perception and Action.

Jorges B, Lopez-Moliner J Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:203.

PMID: 28503140 PMC: 5408029. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00203.


References
1.
Hanson J, Heron J, Whitaker D . Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 185(2):347-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1282-3. View

2.
Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A . Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004; 55:271-304. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005. View

3.
Vroomen J, Keetels M, de Gelder B, Bertelson P . Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 22(1):32-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.003. View

4.
Takahashi K, Saiki J, Watanabe K . Realignment of temporal simultaneity between vision and touch. Neuroreport. 2008; 19(3):319-22. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f4f039. View

5.
Stone J, Hunkin N, Porrill J, Wood R, Keeler V, Beanland M . When is now? Perception of simultaneity. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 268(1462):31-8. PMC: 1087597. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1326. View