» Articles » PMID: 22766486

The Root of All Value: a Neural Common Currency for Choice

Overview
Specialties Biology
Neurology
Date 2012 Jul 7
PMID 22766486
Citations 479
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How do humans make choices between different types of rewards? Economists have long argued on theoretical grounds that humans typically make these choices as if the values of the options they consider have been mapped to a single common scale for comparison. Neuroimaging studies in humans have recently begun to suggest the existence of a small group of specific brain sites that appear to encode the subjective values of different types of rewards on a neural common scale, almost exactly as predicted by theory. We have conducted a meta analysis using data from thirteen different functional magnetic resonance imaging studies published in recent years and we show that the principle brain area associated with this common representation is a subregion of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)/orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). The data available today suggest that this common valuation path is a core system that participates in day-to-day decision making suggesting both a neurobiological foundation for standard economic theory and a tool for measuring preferences neurobiologically. Perhaps even more exciting is the possibility that our emerging understanding of the neural mechanisms for valuation and choice may provide fundamental insights into pathological choice behaviors like addiction, obesity and gambling.

Citing Articles

Neuroforecasting reveals generalizable components of choice.

Genevsky A, Tong L, Knutson B PNAS Nexus. 2025; 4(2):pgaf029.

PMID: 40007578 PMC: 11852258. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf029.


Value signals guiding choices for cannabis versus non-drug rewards in people who use cannabis near-daily.

Lawn W, Hao X, Konova A, Haney M, Cooper Z, Van Dam N Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025; 242(4):681-691.

PMID: 39928130 PMC: 11890362. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-025-06746-6.


Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning.

Sun W, Ripp I, Borrmann A, Moll M, Fairhurst M Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41330.

PMID: 39839521 PMC: 11748724. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41330.


The hummingbird's adipostat: can a simple rule explain torpor frequency and duration in hummingbirds?.

Halter S, Wolf B, Martinez Del Rio C Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2038):20242489.

PMID: 39809315 PMC: 11732420. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2489.


The human reward system encodes the subjective value of ideas during creative thinking.

Moreno-Rodriguez S, Beranger B, Volle E, Lopez-Persem A Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):37.

PMID: 39794481 PMC: 11723971. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07427-4.


References
1.
Zald D, Kim S . Anatomy and function of the orbital frontal cortex, II: Function and relevance to obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1996; 8(3):249-61. DOI: 10.1176/jnp.8.3.249. View

2.
Schoenbaum G, Takahashi Y, Liu T, McDannald M . Does the orbitofrontal cortex signal value?. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011; 1239:87-99. PMC: 3530400. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06210.x. View

3.
Knutson B, Taylor J, Kaufman M, Peterson R, Glover G . Distributed neural representation of expected value. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(19):4806-12. PMC: 6724773. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0642-05.2005. View

4.
Diekhof E, Geier K, Falkai P, Gruber O . Fear is only as deep as the mind allows: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on the regulation of negative affect. Neuroimage. 2011; 58(1):275-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.073. View

5.
Delgado M, Nystrom L, Fissell C, Noll D, Fiez J . Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(6):3072-7. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.6.3072. View