» Articles » PMID: 39322489

The Affective Gradient Hypothesis: an Affect-centered Account of Motivated Behavior

Overview
Journal Trends Cogn Sci
Date 2024 Sep 25
PMID 39322489
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Everyone agrees that feelings and actions are intertwined, but cannot agree how. According to dominant models, actions are directed by estimates of value and these values shape or are shaped by affect. I propose instead that affect is the only form of value that drives actions. Our mind constantly represents potential future states and how they would make us feel. These states collectively form a gradient reflecting feelings we could experience depending on actions we take. Motivated behavior reflects the process of traversing this affective gradient, towards desirable states and away from undesirable ones. This affective gradient hypothesis solves the puzzle of where values and goals come from, and offers a parsimonious account of apparent conflicts between emotion and cognition.

Citing Articles

Healthcare professionals and the public sentiment analysis of ChatGPT in clinical practice.

Lu L, Zhu Y, Yang J, Yang Y, Ye J, Ai S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1223.

PMID: 39774168 PMC: 11707298. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84512-y.


Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Motivation and Decision-making.

Yee D J Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 36(12):2822-2830.

PMID: 39378176 PMC: 11602011. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02258.

References
1.
Damasio A . The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996; 351(1346):1413-20. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0125. View

2.
Phelps E, Lempert K, Sokol-Hessner P . Emotion and decision making: multiple modulatory neural circuits. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014; 37:263-87. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014119. View

3.
Rutledge R, Skandali N, Dayan P, Dolan R . A computational and neural model of momentary subjective well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(33):12252-7. PMC: 4143018. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407535111. View

4.
Keramati M, Gutkin B . Homeostatic reinforcement learning for integrating reward collection and physiological stability. Elife. 2014; 3. PMC: 4270100. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.04811. View

5.
Hazy T, Frank M, OReilly R . Banishing the homunculus: making working memory work. Neuroscience. 2005; 139(1):105-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.067. View