» Articles » PMID: 22761950

BEST: Improved Prediction of B-cell Epitopes from Antigen Sequences

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Jul 5
PMID 22761950
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate identification of immunogenic regions in a given antigen chain is a difficult and actively pursued problem. Although accurate predictors for T-cell epitopes are already in place, the prediction of the B-cell epitopes requires further research. We overview the available approaches for the prediction of B-cell epitopes and propose a novel and accurate sequence-based solution. Our BEST (B-cell Epitope prediction using Support vector machine Tool) method predicts epitopes from antigen sequences, in contrast to some method that predict only from short sequence fragments, using a new architecture based on averaging selected scores generated from sliding 20-mers by a Support Vector Machine (SVM). The SVM predictor utilizes a comprehensive and custom designed set of inputs generated by combining information derived from the chain, sequence conservation, similarity to known (training) epitopes, and predicted secondary structure and relative solvent accessibility. Empirical evaluation on benchmark datasets demonstrates that BEST outperforms several modern sequence-based B-cell epitope predictors including ABCPred, method by Chen et al. (2007), BCPred, COBEpro, BayesB, and CBTOPE, when considering the predictions from antigen chains and from the chain fragments. Our method obtains a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the fragment-based prediction at 0.81 and 0.85, depending on the dataset. The AUCs of BEST on the benchmark sets of full antigen chains equal 0.57 and 0.6, which is significantly and slightly better than the next best method we tested. We also present case studies to contrast the propensity profiles generated by BEST and several other methods.

Citing Articles

Advances of computational methods enhance the development of multi-epitope vaccines.

Wei Y, Qiu T, Ai Y, Zhang Y, Xie J, Zhang D Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(1).

PMID: 39951549 PMC: 11827616. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf055.


Multi-perspectives and challenges in identifying B-cell epitopes.

Kumar N, Bajiya N, Patiyal S, Raghava G Protein Sci. 2023; 32(11):e4785.

PMID: 37733481 PMC: 10578127. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4785.


B-Cell Epitope Predictions Using Computational Methods.

Zheng D, Liang S, Zhang C Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2552:239-254.

PMID: 36346595 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2609-2_12.


Challenges in Serologic Diagnostics of Neglected Human Systemic Mycoses: An Overview on Characterization of New Targets.

Inacio M, Cruz-Leite V, Moreira A, Mattos K, Paccez J, Ruiz O Pathogens. 2022; 11(5).

PMID: 35631090 PMC: 9143782. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11050569.


Progress and challenges for the machine learning-based design of fit-for-purpose monoclonal antibodies.

Akbar R, Bashour H, Rawat P, Robert P, Smorodina E, Cotet T MAbs. 2022; 14(1):2008790.

PMID: 35293269 PMC: 8928824. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2021.2008790.


References
1.
Li W, Godzik A . Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(13):1658-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158. View

2.
Larsen J, Lund O, Nielsen M . Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes. Immunome Res. 2006; 2:2. PMC: 1479323. DOI: 10.1186/1745-7580-2-2. View

3.
Sweredoski M, Baldi P . COBEpro: a novel system for predicting continuous B-cell epitopes. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2008; 22(3):113-20. PMC: 2644406. DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzn075. View

4.
Kulkarni-Kale U, Bhosle S, Kolaskar A . CEP: a conformational epitope prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(Web Server issue):W168-71. PMC: 1160221. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki460. View

5.
Kurgan L, Disfani F . Structural protein descriptors in 1-dimension and their sequence-based predictions. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2011; 12(6):470-89. DOI: 10.2174/138920311796957711. View