Reviewing Social Media Use by Clinicians

Overview

Journal J Am Med Inform Assoc

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2012 Jul 5

PMID 22759618

Citations 88

Authors

Marcio von Muhlen

Lucila Ohno-Machado

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Adoption studies of social media use by clinicians were systematically reviewed, up to July 26th, 2011, to determine the extent of adoption and highlight trends in institutional responses. This search led to 370 articles, of which 50 were selected for review, including 15 adoption surveys. The definition of social media is evolving rapidly; the authors define it broadly to include social networks and group-curated reference sites such as Wikipedia. Facebook accounts are very common among health science students (64-96%) and less so for professional clinicians (13-47%). Adoption rates have increased sharply in the past 4 years. Wikipedia is widely used as a reference tool. Attempts at incorporating social media into clinical training have met with mixed success. Posting of unprofessional content and breaches of patient confidentiality, especially by students, are not uncommon and have prompted calls for social media guidelines.

Citing Articles

Perspectives surrounding robotic total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional analysis using natural language processing.

Levett J, Elkaim L, Zukor D, Huk O, Antoniou J Can J Surg. 2025; 68(1):E10-E16.

PMID: 39753324 PMC: 11684921. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010423.

Social Media Usage for Medical Education and Smartphone Addiction Among Medical Students: National Web-Based Survey.

Clavier T, Chevalier E, Demailly Z, Veber B, Messaadi I, Popoff B JMIR Med Educ. 2024; 10:e55149.

PMID: 39437450 PMC: 11526414. DOI: 10.2196/55149.

Twitter (X) in Medicine: Friend or Foe to the Field of Interventional Cardiology?.

Rana M, Sorger G, Cox D, Dangas G, Forouzandeh F J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 2(6Part A):101136.

PMID: 39129902 PMC: 11307926. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101136.

The role of social media on COVID-19 preventive behaviors worldwide, systematic review.

Fenta E, Bogale E, Anagaw T PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306284.

PMID: 38985700 PMC: 11236194. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306284.

Exploring How People Interact With Dental Misinformation on Social Media: A Cross-Sectional Study.

ALhomsi A, Aldoss H, Aljoujou A, Mashlah A, Hajeer M, Alyafi A Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e56625.

PMID: 38516284 PMC: 10956376. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56625.

References

Cain J, Scott D, Akers P . Pharmacy students' Facebook activity and opinions regarding accountability and e-professionalism. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009; 73(6):104. PMC: 2769526. DOI: 10.5688/aj7306104. View

Gonzalez de Dios J, Camino-Leon R, Ramos-Lizana J . [The use of bibliographic information resources and Web 2.0 by neuropaediatricians]. Rev Neurol. 2011; 52(12):713-9. View

Heilman J, Kemmann E, Bonert M, Chatterjee A, Ragar B, Beards G . Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(1):e14. PMC: 3221335. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1589. View

Hader A, Brown E . Patient privacy and social media. AANA J. 2010; 78(4):270-4. View

Wells K . Social media in medical school education. Surgery. 2011; 150(1):2-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.05.023. View

Pender M, Lasserre K, Del Mar C, Kruesi L, Anuradha S . Is Wikipedia unsuitable as a clinical information resource for medical students?. Med Teach. 2010; 31(12):1095-6. View

Mcgee J, Begg M . What medical educators need to know about "Web 2.0". Med Teach. 2008; 30(2):164-9. DOI: 10.1080/01421590701881673. View

Sandars J, Schroter S . Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey. Postgrad Med J. 2007; 83(986):759-62. PMC: 2750915. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.063123. View

Alkhateeb F, Clauson K, Latif D . Pharmacist use of social media. Int J Pharm Pract. 2011; 19(2):140-2. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2010.00087.x. View

10.

Lagu T, Kaufman E, Asch D, Armstrong K . Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(10):1642-6. PMC: 2533366. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0726-6. View

11.

Chretien K, Azar J, Kind T . Physicians on Twitter. JAMA. 2011; 305(6):566-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.68. View

12.

Frost J, Massagli M . Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data. J Med Internet Res. 2008; 10(3):e15. PMC: 2553248. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1053. View

13.

Chretien K, Goldman E, Beckman L, Kind T . It's your own risk: medical students' perspectives on online professionalism. Acad Med. 2010; 85(10 Suppl):S68-71. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed4778. View

14.

Baer W, Schwartz A . Teaching professionalism in the digital age on the psychiatric consultation-liaison service. Psychosomatics. 2011; 52(4):303-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.02.002. View

15.

Weinstein A, Saadeh P, Warren S . Social networking services: implications for the next generation of physicians. Surgery. 2011; 150(1):15-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.05.026. View

16.

Cain J, Fink J . Legal and ethical issues regarding social media and pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011; 74(10):184. PMC: 3058471. DOI: 10.5688/aj7410184. View

17.

Thompson L, Black E, Duff W, Black N, Saliba H, Dawson K . Protected health information on social networking sites: ethical and legal considerations. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(1):e8. PMC: 3221358. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1590. View

18.

Eytan T, Benabio J, Golla V, Parikh R, Stein S . Social media and the health system. Perm J. 2011; 15(1):71-4. PMC: 3048641. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/10-154. View

19.

Greysen S, Kind T, Chretien K . Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25(11):1227-9. PMC: 2947638. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1447-1. View

20.

Chretien K, Greysen S, Chretien J, Kind T . Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009; 302(12):1309-15. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1387. View