» Articles » PMID: 22718285

A Summary of Recommendations for Occupational Radiation Protection in Interventional Cardiology

Overview
Date 2012 Jun 22
PMID 22718285
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The radiation dose received by cardiologists during percutaneous coronary interventions, electrophysiology procedures, and other interventional cardiology procedures can vary by more than an order of magnitude for the same type of procedure and for similar patient doses. There is particular concern regarding occupational dose to the lens of the eye. This document provides recommendations for occupational radiation protection for physicians and other staff in the interventional suite. Simple methods for reducing or minimizing occupational radiation dose include minimizing fluoroscopy time and the number of acquired images; using available patient dose reduction technologies; using good imaging-chain geometry; collimating; avoiding high-scatter areas; using protective shielding; using imaging equipment whose performance is controlled through a quality assurance program; and wearing personal dosimeters so that you know your dose. Effective use of these methods requires both appropriate education and training in radiation protection for all interventional cardiology personnel, and the availability of appropriate protective tools and equipment. Regular review and investigation of personnel monitoring results, accompanied as appropriate by changes in how procedures are performed and equipment used, will ensure continual improvement in the practice of radiation protection in the interventional suite. These recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology and electrophysiology have been endorsed by the Asian Pacific Society of Interventional Cardiology, the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, the Latin American Society of Interventional Cardiology, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Citing Articles

Sensor Enabled Catheter Ablation Study (SECAS).

Rabah H, Youness M, Rabah A Cureus. 2021; 13(11):e19550.

PMID: 34926037 PMC: 8671080. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19550.


Establishing ionising radiation safety culture during interventional cardiovascular procedures.

van der Merwe B Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021; 32(5):271-275.

PMID: 34405852 PMC: 8756052. DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2021-030.


Zero-fluoroscopy approach for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia using the Ensite NavX system: a multicenter experience.

Chen G, Wang Y, Proietti R, Wang X, Ouyang F, Ma C BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020; 20(1):48.

PMID: 32013865 PMC: 6996189. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01344-0.


Utilization of an Optimized Radiation Strategy in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Zhong X, Gao W, Huang D, Ge L, Qian J, Ge J Cardiol Res Pract. 2019; 2019:6094806.

PMID: 31565430 PMC: 6745148. DOI: 10.1155/2019/6094806.


Comparison of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography vs. contrast agent injection.

Sun Y, Yin X, Cong T, Gao L, Chang D, Xiao X Chin Med J (Engl). 2019; 132(3):285-293.

PMID: 30681494 PMC: 6595802. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000076.