» Articles » PMID: 22712526

Does Risk for Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm Excel Human Epididymis Protein 4 and CA125 in Predicting Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2012 Jun 21
PMID 22712526
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Backgrounds: Risk for Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) appear to be promising predictors for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), however, conflicting results exist in the diagnostic performance comparison among ROMA, HE4 and CA125.

Methods: Remote databases (MEDLINE/PUBMED, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov) and full texts bibliography were searched for relevant abstracts. All studies included were closely assessed with the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2). EOC predictive value of ROMA was systematically evaluated, and comparison among the predictive performances of ROMA, HE4 and CA125 were conducted within the same population. Sensitivity, specificity, DOR (diagnostic odds ratio), LR ± (positive and negative likelihood ratio) and AUC (area under receiver operating characteristic-curve) were summarized with a bivariate model. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the heterogeneity.

Results: Data of 7792 tests were retrieved from 11 studies. The overall estimates of ROMA for EOC predicting were: sensitivity (0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.93), specificity (0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.88), and AUC (0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.95). Comparison of EOC predictive value between HE4 and CA125 found, specificity: HE4 (0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.96) > CA125 (0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.90); AUC: CA125 (0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.91) > HE4 (0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.85). Comparison of OC predictive value between HE4 and CA125 found, AUC: CA125 (0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.91) > HE4 (0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.83). Comparison among the three tests for EOC prediction found, sensitivity: ROMA (0.86, 95%CI 0.81-0.91) > HE4 (0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.85); specificity: HE4 (0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.96) > ROMA (0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.88) > CA125 (0.78, 95%CI 0.73-0.83).

Conclusions: ROMA is helpful for distinguishing epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic mass. HE4 is not better than CA125 either for EOC or OC prediction. ROMA is promising predictors of epithelial ovarian cancer to replace CA125, but its utilization requires further exploration.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic performance of the Mindray system in detecting CA125 and HE4 for patients with ovarian cancer.

Feng P, Chen T, Wischhusen J, Ladbury C, Vargas-Hernandez V, Xiong Y Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(8):4474-4484.

PMID: 39262481 PMC: 11385533. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-1107.


Sensitivity and Specificity of Selected Biomarkers and Their Combinations in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.

Englisz A, Smycz-Kubanska M, Mielczarek-Palacz A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38732363 PMC: 11083226. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090949.


Diagnostic biomarkers in ovarian cancer: advances beyond CA125 and HE4.

Ghose A, McCann L, Makker S, Mukherjee U, Gullapalli S, Erekkath J Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241233225.

PMID: 38435431 PMC: 10908239. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241233225.


Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm and Pelvic Mass Score for the prediction of malignant ovarian tumors: a prospective comparative study.

Ali M, Sweed M, NasrElDin E, Ahmed W, ElHawwary G J Ultrason. 2024; 24(94):1-8.

PMID: 38343788 PMC: 10850940. DOI: 10.15557/jou.2024.0001.


Comparison of Human Epididymis Protein 4, Cancer Antigen 125, and Ultrasound Prediction Model in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Adnexal Masses.

Bahadur A, Bhattacharya N, Mundhra R, Khoiwal K, Chawla L, Singh R J Midlife Health. 2024; 14(3):176-183.

PMID: 38312761 PMC: 10836431. DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_77_23.


References
1.
Zhou Y, Yin X, Ying J, Zhang B . Golgi protein 73 versus alpha-fetoprotein as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma: a diagnostic meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2012; 12:17. PMC: 3292967. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-17. View

2.
Leeflang M, Deeks J, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt P . Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149(12):889-97. PMC: 2956514. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008. View

3.
Chang X, Ye X, Dong L, Cheng H, Cheng Y, Zhu L . Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a serum tumor biomarker in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011; 21(5):852-8. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31821a3726. View

4.
Hellstrom I, Raycraft J, Hayden-Ledbetter M, Ledbetter J, Schummer M, McIntosh M . The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003; 63(13):3695-700. View

5.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View