Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm in Women with a Pelvic Mass
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: It is often difficult to distinguish a benign pelvic mass from a malignancy and tools to help referring physician are needed. The purpose of this study was to validate the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm in women presenting with a pelvic mass.
Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, blinded clinical trial that included women who presented to a gynecologist, a family practitioner, an internist, or a general surgeon with an adnexal mass. Serum HE4 and CA 125 were determined preoperatively. A Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm score was calculated and classified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups for having a malignancy. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm were estimated.
Results: A total of 472 patients were evaluated with 383 women diagnosed with benign disease and 89 women with a malignancy. The incidence of all cancers was 15% and 10% for ovarian cancer. In the postmenopausal group, a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 76.0% and for the premenopausal group the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 74.2% for detecting ovarian cancer. When considering all women together, the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm had a sensitivity of 93.8%, a specificity of 74.9%, and a negative predictive value of 99.0%.
Conclusion: The use of the serum biomarkers HE4 and CA 125 with the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm has a high sensitivity for the prediction of ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass. These findings support the use of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm as a tool for the triage of women with an adnexal mass to gynecologic oncologists.
Level Of Evidence: II.
Metabolomics of Papanicolaou Tests for the Discovery of Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers.
Sah S, Schwiebert E, Moore S, Liu Y, Gaul D, Boylan K Metabolites. 2024; 14(11).
PMID: 39590836 PMC: 11596055. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14110600.
Machine-learning diagnostic models for ovarian tumors.
Sun Y, Wen B Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e36994.
PMID: 39381112 PMC: 11456824. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36994.
Kwong F, Kristunas C, Davenport C, Aggarwal R, Deeks J, Mallett S BJOG. 2024; 131(10):1400-1410.
PMID: 38556698 PMC: 7616335. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17813.
Diagnostic biomarkers in ovarian cancer: advances beyond CA125 and HE4.
Ghose A, McCann L, Makker S, Mukherjee U, Gullapalli S, Erekkath J Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241233225.
PMID: 38435431 PMC: 10908239. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241233225.
Serum Lipidome Profiling Reveals a Distinct Signature of Ovarian Cancer in Korean Women.
Sah S, Bifarin O, Moore S, Gaul D, Chung H, Kwon S Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(5):681-693.
PMID: 38412029 PMC: 11061607. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1293.