» Articles » PMID: 22709571

Genomic Characterization of Explant Tumorgraft Models Derived from Fresh Patient Tumor Tissue

Abstract

Background: There is resurgence within drug and biomarker development communities for the use of primary tumorgraft models as improved predictors of patient tumor response to novel therapeutic strategies. Despite perceived advantages over cell line derived xenograft models, there is limited data comparing the genotype and phenotype of tumorgrafts to the donor patient tumor, limiting the determination of molecular relevance of the tumorgraft model. This report directly compares the genomic characteristics of patient tumors and the derived tumorgraft models, including gene expression, and oncogenic mutation status.

Methods: Fresh tumor tissues from 182 cancer patients were implanted subcutaneously into immune-compromised mice for the development of primary patient tumorgraft models. Histological assessment was performed on both patient tumors and the resulting tumorgraft models. Somatic mutations in key oncogenes and gene expression levels of resulting tumorgrafts were compared to the matched patient tumors using the OncoCarta (Sequenom, San Diego, CA) and human gene microarray (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) platforms respectively. The genomic stability of the established tumorgrafts was assessed across serial in vivo generations in a representative subset of models. The genomes of patient tumors that formed tumorgrafts were compared to those that did not to identify the possible molecular basis to successful engraftment or rejection.

Results: Fresh tumor tissues from 182 cancer patients were implanted into immune-compromised mice with forty-nine tumorgraft models that have been successfully established, exhibiting strong histological and genomic fidelity to the originating patient tumors. Comparison of the transcriptomes and oncogenic mutations between the tumorgrafts and the matched patient tumors were found to be stable across four tumorgraft generations. Not only did the various tumors retain the differentiation pattern, but supporting stromal elements were preserved. Those genes down-regulated specifically in tumorgrafts were enriched in biological pathways involved in host immune response, consistent with the immune deficiency status of the host. Patient tumors that successfully formed tumorgrafts were enriched for cell signaling, cell cycle, and cytoskeleton pathways and exhibited evidence of reduced immunogenicity.

Conclusions: The preservation of the patient's tumor genomic profile and tumor microenvironment supports the view that primary patient tumorgrafts provide a relevant model to support the translation of new therapeutic strategies and personalized medicine approaches in oncology.

Citing Articles

Polysaccharides and Structural Proteins as Components in Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Breast Cancer Tissue Models: A Review.

Pasquier E, Rosendahl J, Solberg A, Stahlberg A, Hakansson J, Chinga-Carrasco G Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(6).

PMID: 37370613 PMC: 10295496. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10060682.


Synovial Sarcoma Preclinical Modeling: Integrating Transgenic Mouse Models and Patient-Derived Models for Translational Research.

Landuzzi L, Ruzzi F, Lollini P, Scotlandi K Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765545 PMC: 9913760. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030588.


Patient-Derived Xenograft: A More Standard "Avatar" Model in Preclinical Studies of Gastric Cancer.

Zeng M, Pi C, Li K, Sheng L, Zuo Y, Yuan J Front Oncol. 2022; 12:898563.

PMID: 35664756 PMC: 9161630. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.898563.


Patient-Derived Explants of Colorectal Cancer: Histopathological and Molecular Analysis of Long-Term Cultures.

da Mata S, Franchi-Mendes T, Abreu S, Filipe B, Morgado S, Mesquita M Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(18).

PMID: 34572922 PMC: 8465429. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184695.


Patient Derived Xenografts for Genome-Driven Therapy of Osteosarcoma.

Landuzzi L, Manara M, Lollini P, Scotlandi K Cells. 2021; 10(2).

PMID: 33671173 PMC: 7922432. DOI: 10.3390/cells10020416.


References
1.
Voskoglou-Nomikos T, Pater J, Seymour L . Clinical predictive value of the in vitro cell line, human xenograft, and mouse allograft preclinical cancer models. Clin Cancer Res. 2003; 9(11):4227-39. View

2.
Ellis L, Fidler I . Finding the tumor copycat. Therapy fails, patients don't. Nat Med. 2010; 16(9):974-5. DOI: 10.1038/nm0910-974. View

3.
Pelleitier M, Montplaisir S . The nude mouse: a model of deficient T-cell function. Methods Achiev Exp Pathol. 1975; 7:149-66. View

4.
Johnson J, Decker S, Zaharevitz D, Rubinstein L, Venditti J, SCHEPARTZ S . Relationships between drug activity in NCI preclinical in vitro and in vivo models and early clinical trials. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84(10):1424-31. PMC: 2363645. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1796. View

5.
HOUGHTON J, Taylor D . Maintenance of biological and biochemical characteristics of human colorectal tumours during serial passage in immune-deprived mice. Br J Cancer. 1978; 37(2):199-212. PMC: 2009589. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1978.28. View