» Articles » PMID: 22705924

DNA Methylation Analyses of Urothelial Carcinoma Reveal Distinct Epigenetic Subtypes and an Association Between Gene Copy Number and Methylation Status

Abstract

We assessed DNA methylation and copy number status of 27,000 CpGs in 149 urothelial carcinomas and integrated the findings with gene expression and mutation data. Methylation was associated with gene expression for 1,332 CpGs, of which 26% showed positive correlation with expression, i.e., high methylation and high gene expression levels. These positively correlated CpGs were part of specific transcription factor binding sites, such as sites for MYC and CREBP1, or located in gene bodies. Furthermore, we found genes with copy number gains, low expression and high methylation levels, revealing an association between methylation and copy number levels. This phenomenon was typically observed for developmental genes, such as HOX genes, and tumor suppressor genes. In contrast, we also identified genes with copy number gains, high expression and low methylation levels. This was for instance observed for some keratin genes. Tumor cases could be grouped into four subgroups, termed epitypes, by their DNA methylation profiles. One epitype was influenced by the presence of infiltrating immune cells, two epitypes were mainly composed of non-muscle invasive tumors, and the remaining epitype of muscle invasive tumors. The polycomb complex protein EZH2 that blocks differentiation in embryonic stem cells showed increased expression both at the mRNA and protein levels in the muscle invasive epitype, together with methylation of polycomb target genes and HOX genes. Our data highlights HOX gene silencing and EZH2 expression as mechanisms to promote a more undifferentiated and aggressive state in UC.

Citing Articles

The urothelial gene regulatory network: understanding biology to improve bladder cancer management.

Ramal M, Corral S, Kalisz M, Lapi E, Real F Oncogene. 2023; 43(1):1-21.

PMID: 37996699 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-023-02876-3.


Tumor purity adjusted beta values improve biological interpretability of high-dimensional DNA methylation data.

Staaf J, Aine M PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0265557.

PMID: 36084090 PMC: 9462735. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265557.


SLC14A1 prevents oncometabolite accumulation and recruits HDAC1 to transrepress oncometabolite genes in urothelial carcinoma.

Chan T, Wu W, Li W, Shiao M, Shiue Y, Li C Theranostics. 2020; 10(25):11775-11793.

PMID: 33052246 PMC: 7546005. DOI: 10.7150/thno.51655.


Circulating Tumor Cell Clustering Shapes DNA Methylation to Enable Metastasis Seeding.

Gkountela S, Castro-Giner F, Szczerba B, Vetter M, Landin J, Scherrer R Cell. 2019; 176(1-2):98-112.e14.

PMID: 30633912 PMC: 6363966. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.046.


Epigenetic Alterations in Bladder Cancer.

Porten S Curr Urol Rep. 2018; 19(12):102.

PMID: 30357502 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-018-0861-5.


References
1.
Irizarry R, Ladd-Acosta C, Wen B, Wu Z, Montano C, Onyango P . The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nat Genet. 2009; 41(2):178-186. PMC: 2729128. DOI: 10.1038/ng.298. View

2.
Ashburner M, Ball C, Blake J, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry J . Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25(1):25-9. PMC: 3037419. DOI: 10.1038/75556. View

3.
Kandimalla R, VAN Tilborg A, Kompier L, Stumpel D, Stam R, Bangma C . Genome-wide analysis of CpG island methylation in bladder cancer identified TBX2, TBX3, GATA2, and ZIC4 as pTa-specific prognostic markers. Eur Urol. 2012; 61(6):1245-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.011. View

4.
Hinoue T, Weisenberger D, Lange C, Shen H, Byun H, van den Berg D . Genome-scale analysis of aberrant DNA methylation in colorectal cancer. Genome Res. 2011; 22(2):271-82. PMC: 3266034. DOI: 10.1101/gr.117523.110. View

5.
Blaveri E, Brewer J, Roydasgupta R, Fridlyand J, DeVries S, Koppie T . Bladder cancer stage and outcome by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11(19 Pt 1):7012-22. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0177. View