» Articles » PMID: 22692363

Numerical Comparison of the Closing Dynamics of a New Trileaflet and a Bileaflet Mechanical Aortic Heart Valve

Overview
Journal J Artif Organs
Date 2012 Jun 14
PMID 22692363
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The closing velocity of the leaflets of mechanical heart valves is excessively rapid and can cause the cavitation phenomenon. Cavitation bubbles collapse and produce high pressure which then damages red blood cells and platelets. The closure mechanism of the trileaflet valve uses the vortices in the aortic sinus to help close the leaflets, which differs from that of the monoleaflet or bileaflet mechanical heart valves which mainly depends on the reverse flow. We used the commercial software program Fluent to run numerical simulations of the St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve and a new trileaflet mechanical heart valve. The results of these numerical simulations were validated with flow field experiments. The closing velocity of the trileaflet valve was clearly slower than that of the St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve, which would effectively reduce the occurrence of cavitation. The findings of this study are expected to advance the development of the trileaflet valve.

Citing Articles

Rethinking mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: new paradigms in design and testing.

Chakraborty S, Simon M, Bellofiore A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 11:1458809.

PMID: 39949724 PMC: 11822478. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1458809.


Fluid-structure interaction simulation of mechanical aortic valves: a narrative review exploring its role in total product life cycle.

Arminio M, Carbonaro D, Morbiducci U, Gallo D, Chiastra C Front Med Technol. 2024; 6:1399729.

PMID: 39011523 PMC: 11247014. DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1399729.


Evolving technology: the TRIFLO tri-leaflet mechanical valve without oral anticoagulation: a potential major innovation in valve surgery.

Carrel T, Vogt P, Obrist D, Schaff H Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1220633.

PMID: 37840955 PMC: 10570810. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220633.


Biomechanical analysis of novel leaflet geometries for bioprosthetic valves.

Pandya P, Park M, Zhu Y, Woo Y JTCVS Open. 2023; 14:77-86.

PMID: 37425479 PMC: 10328959. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.04.007.


Review of numerical methods for simulation of mechanical heart valves and the potential for blood clotting.

Zakaria M, Ismail F, Tamagawa M, Abdul Aziz A, Wiriadidjaja S, Basri A Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017; 55(9):1519-1548.

PMID: 28744828 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1688-9.


References
1.
Carey R, Porter J, Richard G, Luck C, Shu M, Guo G . An interlaboratory comparison of the FDA protocol for the evaluation of cavitation potential of mechanical heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995; 4(5):532-9; discussion 539-41. View

2.
Lu P, Liu J, Huang R, Lo C, Lai H, Hwang N . The closing behavior of mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses. ASAIO J. 2004; 50(4):294-300. DOI: 10.1097/01.mat.0000130678.59655.c0. View

3.
Dumont K, Vierendeels J, Kaminsky R, Van Nooten G, Verdonck P, Bluestein D . Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model. J Biomech Eng. 2007; 129(4):558-65. DOI: 10.1115/1.2746378. View

4.
Ge L, Sotiropoulos F . A Numerical Method for Solving the 3D Unsteady Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations in Curvilinear Domains with Complex Immersed Boundaries. J Comput Phys. 2009; 225(2):1782-1809. PMC: 2635106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.017. View

5.
He Z, Xi B, Zhu K, Hwang N . Mechanisms of mechanical heart valve cavitation: investigation using a tilting disk valve model. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001; 10(5):666-74. View