» Articles » PMID: 22690722

Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics and in Vivo Cancer Targeting Capability of Au Nanocages by Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

Overview
Journal ACS Nano
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2012 Jun 14
PMID 22690722
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gold nanocages have recently emerged as a novel class of photothermal transducers and drug carriers for cancer treatment. However, their pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting capability remain largely unexplored due to the lack of an imaging modality for quick and reliable mapping of their distributions in vivo. Herein, Au nanocages were prepared with controlled physicochemical properties and radiolabeled with (64)Cu in high specific activities for in vivo evaluation using positron emission tomography (PET). Our pharmacokinetic studies with femtomolar administrations suggest that 30 nm nanocages had a greatly improved biodistribution profile than 55 nm nanocages, together with higher blood retention and lower hepatic and splenic uptakes. In a murine EMT-6 breast cancer model, the small cages also showed a significantly higher level of tumor uptake and a greater tumor-to-muscle ratio than the large cages. Quantitative PET imaging confirmed rapid accumulation and retention of Au nanocages inside the tumors. The ability to directly and quickly image the distribution of Au nanocages in vivo allows us to further optimize their physicochemical properties for a range of theranostic applications.

Citing Articles

Quantification, Exchange, and Removal of Surface Ligands on Noble-Metal Nanocrystals.

Li K, Wu C, Yang T, Qin D, Xia Y Acc Chem Res. 2023; 56(12):1517-1527.

PMID: 37162754 PMC: 10286308. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00116.


Photothermal effects of CuS-BSA nanoparticles on H22 hepatoma-bearing mice.

Dun X, Liu S, Ge N, Liu M, Li M, Zhang J Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:1029986.

PMID: 36313308 PMC: 9596806. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1029986.


Bioimaging guided pharmaceutical evaluations of nanomedicines for clinical translations.

Tuguntaev R, Hussain A, Fu C, Chen H, Tao Y, Huang Y J Nanobiotechnology. 2022; 20(1):236.

PMID: 35590412 PMC: 9118863. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01451-4.


Safety Evaluation of Nanotechnology Products.

Domb A, Sharifzadeh G, Nahum V, Hosseinkhani H Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(10).

PMID: 34683908 PMC: 8539492. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101615.


Nanotechnology-Based Strategies to Overcome Current Barriers in Gene Delivery.

Miron-Barroso S, Domenech E, Trigueros S Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(16).

PMID: 34445243 PMC: 8395193. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168537.


References
1.
Rao J . Shedding light on tumors using nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2009; 2(10):1984-6. DOI: 10.1021/nn800669n. View

2.
Lipka J, Semmler-Behnke M, Sperling R, Wenk A, Takenaka S, Schleh C . Biodistribution of PEG-modified gold nanoparticles following intratracheal instillation and intravenous injection. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(25):6574-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.009. View

3.
Zhang Q, Cobley C, Zeng J, Wen L, Chen J, Xia Y . Dissolving Ag from Au-Ag Alloy Nanoboxes with H(2)O(2): A Method for Both Tailoring the Optical Properties and Measuring the H(2)O(2) Concentration. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces. 2010; 114(14):6396-6400. PMC: 2873216. DOI: 10.1021/jp100354z. View

4.
ROBERTS W, Hasan T . Tumor-secreted vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor influences photosensitizer uptake. Cancer Res. 1993; 53(1):153-7. View

5.
Ametamey S, Honer M, Schubiger P . Molecular imaging with PET. Chem Rev. 2008; 108(5):1501-16. DOI: 10.1021/cr0782426. View