» Articles » PMID: 22670204

Influence of Different Computational Approaches for Stent Deployment on Cerebral Aneurysm Haemodynamics

Overview
Journal Interface Focus
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 Jun 7
PMID 22670204
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cerebral aneurysms are abnormal focal dilatations of artery walls. The interest in virtual tools to help clinicians to value the effectiveness of different procedures for cerebral aneurysm treatment is constantly growing. This study is focused on the analysis of the influence of different stent deployment approaches on intra-aneurysmal haemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). A self-expanding stent was deployed in an idealized aneurysmatic cerebral vessel in two initial positions. Different cases characterized by a progression of simplifications on stent modelling (geometry and material) and vessel material properties were set up, using finite element and fast virtual stenting methods. Then, CFD analysis was performed for untreated and stented vessels. Haemodynamic parameters were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively, comparing the cases and the two initial positions. All the cases predicted a reduction of average wall shear stress and average velocity of almost 50 per cent after stent deployment for both initial positions. Results highlighted that, although some differences in calculated parameters existed across the cases based on the modelling simplifications, all the approaches described the most important effects on intra-aneurysmal haemodynamics. Hence, simpler and faster modelling approaches could be included in clinical workflow and, despite the adopted simplifications, support clinicians in the treatment planning.

Citing Articles

Efficient simulation of a low-profile visualized intraluminal support device: a novel fast virtual stenting technique.

Zhang Q, Liu J, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Tian Z, Li W Chin Neurosurg J. 2020; 4:6.

PMID: 32922867 PMC: 7398371. DOI: 10.1186/s41016-018-0112-0.


A novel virtual flow diverter implantation method with realistic deployment mechanics and validated force response.

Zavodszky G, Csippa B, Paal G, Szikora I Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2020; 36(6):e3340.

PMID: 32279440 PMC: 7317397. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3340.


Hydrodynamic Resistance of Intracranial Flow-Diverter Stents: Measurement Description and Data Evaluation.

Csippa B, Gyurki D, Zavodszky G, Szikora I, Paal G Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2019; 11(1):1-13.

PMID: 31797262 PMC: 7002337. DOI: 10.1007/s13239-019-00445-y.


The Role of Hemodynamics in Intracranial Bifurcation Arteries after Aneurysm Treatment with Flow-Diverter Stents.

Narata A, de Moura F, Larrabide I, Perrault C, Patat F, Bibi R AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017; 39(2):323-330.

PMID: 29170270 PMC: 7410576. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5471.


Phantom-based experimental validation of fast virtual deployment of self-expandable stents for cerebral aneurysms.

Zhang Q, Meng Z, Zhang Y, Yao K, Liu J, Zhang Y Biomed Eng Online. 2017; 15(Suppl 2):125.

PMID: 28155680 PMC: 5260011. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0250-6.


References
1.
Early M, Lally C, Prendergast P, Kelly D . Stresses in peripheral arteries following stent placement: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2008; 12(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1080/10255840903065043. View

2.
Dequidt J, Marchal M, Duriez C, Kerien E, Cotin S . Interactive simulation of embolization coils: modeling and experimental validation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008; 11(Pt 1):695-702. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_83. View

3.
Wardlaw J, White P . The detection and management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Brain. 2000; 123 ( Pt 2):205-21. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.2.205. View

4.
Tsang J, Naughton P, Leong S, Hill A, Kelly C, Leahy A . Virtual reality simulation in endovascular surgical training. Surgeon. 2008; 6(4):214-20. DOI: 10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80031-5. View

5.
Gijsen F, Migliavacca F, Schievano S, Socci L, Petrini L, Thury A . Simulation of stent deployment in a realistic human coronary artery. Biomed Eng Online. 2008; 7:23. PMC: 2525649. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-7-23. View