» Articles » PMID: 22667762

Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation: Results in 21 Consecutively Operated Patients Using the Round Window Approach

Overview
Date 2012 Jun 7
PMID 22667762
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conclusion: Prevalent hearing conservation may be achieved after round window (RW) cochlear implantation using soft and flexible electrode arrays if variations of RW anatomy, topography, and facial nerve position are considered. The most favorable electrode insertion depth remains to be established.

Objectives: We assessed the incidence of cochlear function after cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion through the RW in our first 21 consecutively operated patients aimed at hearing conservation.

Methods: Eleven patients had a preoperative low frequency hearing suitable for electro-acoustic stimulation. Hearing was preserved in an additional nine patients at their request with the intention to use full frequency CI stimulation. Anatomic variations of the RW were carefully considered using our temporal bone collection of micro-dissected ears. Electrode extension was assessed on X-ray by measuring the insertion angle of the first electrode and intra-cochlear length and correlated with audiometric data.

Results: There was no incidence of total loss of residual hearing in any of the patients. A slight deterioration of low frequency thresholds occurred in some patients. Mean hearing loss at 125-500 Hz was 14.4 dB at 1 month following surgery and 15.6 dB after 1 year. Insertion angle (300-540°) and depth (17.5-28.5 mm) were not statistically correlated to hearing loss.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study.

Tavora-Vieira D, Voola M, Kuthubutheen J, Friedland P, Gibson D, Acharya A J Pers Med. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37623526 PMC: 10455663. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081276.


Can an individual with low frequency hearing in the candidate ear benefit from a cochlear implant even if they have normal hearing in the other ear?.

Lorens A, Skarzynski P, Obrycka A, Skarzynski H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 280(11):4895-4902.

PMID: 37221309 PMC: 10562342. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08011-y.


Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.

Mamelle E, Granger B, Sterkers O, Lahlou G, Ferrary E, Nguyen Y Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 277(3):705-713.

PMID: 31802226 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05745-6.


Radiologic measurement of cochlea and hearing preservation rate using slim straight electrode (CI422) and round window approach.

Skarzynski H, Matusiak M, Furmanek M, Pilka A, Wlodarczyk E, Oldak M Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018; 38(5):468-475.

PMID: 30498276 PMC: 6265667. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-1579.


Cochlear Implant Electrode Array From Partial to Full Insertion in Non-Human Primate Model.

Manrique-Huarte R, Calavia D, Gallego M, Manrique M J Int Adv Otol. 2018; 14(1):5-9.

PMID: 29764773 PMC: 6354498. DOI: 10.5152/iao.2018.5233.