» Articles » PMID: 22654995

Dynamic Analysis of the KlGAL Regulatory System in Kluyveromyces Lactis: a Comparative Study with Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Overview
Journal Syst Synth Biol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2012 Jun 2
PMID 22654995
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The GAL regulatory system is highly conserved in yeast species of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis. While the GAL system is a well studied system in S. cerevisiae, the dynamic behavior of the KlGAL system in K. lactis has not been characterized. Here, we have characterized the GAL system in yeast K. lactis by developing a dynamic model and comparing its performance to its not-so-distant cousin S. cerevisiae. The present analysis demonstrates the significance of the autoregulatory feedbacks due to KlGal4p, KlGal80p, KlGal1p and Lac12p on the dynamic performance of the KlGAL switch. The model predicts the experimentally observed absence of bistability in the wild type strain of K. lactis, unlike the short term memory of preculturing conditions observed in S. cerevisiae. The performance of the GAL switch is distinct for the two yeast species although they share similarities in the molecular components. The analysis suggests that the whole genome duplication of S. cerevisiae, which resulted in a dedicated inducer protein, Gal3p, may be responsible for the high sensitivity of the system to galactose concentrations. On the other hand, K. lactis uses a bifunctional protein as an inducer in addition to its galactokinase activity, which restricts its regulatory role and hence higher galactose levels in the medium are needed to trigger the GAL system.

Electronic Supplementary Material: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11693-011-9082-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Citing Articles

Past, Present, and Future Perspectives on Whey as a Promising Feedstock for Bioethanol Production by Yeast.

Zou J, Chang X J Fungi (Basel). 2022; 8(4).

PMID: 35448626 PMC: 9031875. DOI: 10.3390/jof8040395.

References
1.
Verma M, Bhat P, Venkatesh K . Quantitative analysis of GAL genetic switch of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals that nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Gal80p results in a highly sensitive response to galactose. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(49):48764-9. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M303526200. View

2.
Santillan M, Mackey M . Dynamic regulation of the tryptophan operon: a modeling study and comparison with experimental data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(4):1364-9. PMC: 29262. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1364. View

3.
Flick J, Johnston M . Two systems of glucose repression of the GAL1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990; 10(9):4757-69. PMC: 361077. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4757-4769.1990. View

4.
Nehlin J, Carlberg M, Ronne H . Control of yeast GAL genes by MIG1 repressor: a transcriptional cascade in the glucose response. EMBO J. 1991; 10(11):3373-7. PMC: 453065. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04901.x. View

5.
Rubio-Texeira M . A comparative analysis of the GAL genetic switch between not-so-distant cousins: Saccharomyces cerevisiae versus Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005; 5(12):1115-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.05.003. View