» Articles » PMID: 22644433

Comparative Analysis of Complications of Different Reconstructive Techniques Following Anterior Decompression for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 May 31
PMID 22644433
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Anterior approach was extensively used in surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Following anterior decompression, many different reconstructive techniques (multilevel ACDF, hybrid construct and long corpectomy) all had satisfied outcomes. However, there are few studies focusing on the comparison of these three reconstructed techniques. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the complications of these three different methods.

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the complications in 286 consecutive patients with multilevel CSM who underwent anterior cervical surgery from 2005 to 2010. This case series had 166 men and 120 women whose mean age at surgery was 53.8 years (range from 33 to 74 years). Radiographic evaluation was taken the day after surgery, and the flexion-extension X-rays were added 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively to evaluate the fusion condition. Preoperative versus postoperative neurologic function and clinical outcome were evaluated using scoring systems such as the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA score), Neck Disability Index (NDI score) and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36 score).

Results: There were no significant differences in JOA scores, NDI scores and SF-36 scores of the pairwise comparison among the three groups. The complications in our series included graft migration, collapse or displacement, hoarseness, dysphagia, C5 palsy, cerebral fluid leakage and wound infection. Sixty-one patients developed complications after surgery and the rate of complication was 21.33 %. Patients in the long corpectomy group had the highest rate of complications; the other two groups had a much lower rate of complications by the latest follow-up. The patients in the multilevel ACDF group had the highest fusion rate by the last follow-up. Patients who had C2-3 and C3-4 segments involved had a higher rate of postoperative hoarseness and dysphagia.

Conclusions: Most of the complications of the three reconstructive techniques subsided gradually after conservative treatment; none of them needed revision surgery. The multilevel ACDF approach has the lowest rate of non-union, but a slightly higher morbidity of the laryngeal nerve-related complication if proximal segments were involved. The long corpectomy approach should be selected prudently because of the high rate of complication.

Citing Articles

A Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in 25727 Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Deformity.

Barot K, Ruiz-Cardozo M, Singh S, Trevino G, Kann M, Brehm S Global Spine J. 2024; 15(2):1390-1404.

PMID: 39091072 PMC: 11571742. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241270100.


Correlation of imaging characteristics of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the surgical approach with improvement for postoperative neck pain and neural function: a retrospective cohort study.

Ma Z, Ye Q, Ma X, Chen C, Feng H, Zhang Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(6):3923-3938.

PMID: 38846315 PMC: 11151240. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1481.


Surgical tactics of two-segmental cervical degenerative diseases: risk factors retrospective assessment and preoperative planning.

Byvaltsev V, Kalinin A, Kuharev A, Azhibekov N, Aliyev M J Spine Surg. 2024; 10(1):98-108.

PMID: 38567006 PMC: 10982927. DOI: 10.21037/jss-23-99.


Could the different surgical goals of fusion and non-fusion also be achieved in combination within the same patient? Clinical and radiological outcome of hybrid cervical spine surgery.

Heider F, Kamenova M, Wanke-Jellinek L, Siepe C, Mehren C Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(6):2287-2297.

PMID: 38553584 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08204-x.


[Clinical outcomes of 3D-printing stand-alone artificial vertebral body in anterior cervical surgeries].

Hu P, Li Y, Liu X, Tang Y, Li Z, Liu Z Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024; 56(1):161-166.

PMID: 38318912 PMC: 10845191.


References
1.
Baron E, Soliman A, Gaughan J, Simpson L, Young W . Dysphagia, hoarseness, and unilateral true vocal fold motion impairment following anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003; 112(11):921-6. DOI: 10.1177/000348940311201102. View

2.
Beutler W, Sweeney C, Connolly P . Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury with anterior cervical spine surgery risk with laterality of surgical approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(12):1337-42. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200106150-00014. View

3.
Riley 3rd L, Skolasky R, Albert T, Vaccaro A, Heller J . Dysphagia after anterior cervical decompression and fusion: prevalence and risk factors from a longitudinal cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(22):2564-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186317.86379.02. View

4.
Lin Q, Zhou X, Wang X, Cao P, Tsai N, Yuan W . A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(3):474-81. PMC: 3296841. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1961-9. View

5.
Liu T, Xu W, Cheng T, Yang H . Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy, which one is better? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2010; 20(2):224-35. PMC: 3030711. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1486-7. View