» Articles » PMID: 31829200

The Change of Cervical Sagittal Parameters Plays an Important Role in Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy After Multi-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Dec 13
PMID 31829200
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cervical sagittal parameters were closely related with clinical outcomes after multi-level ACDF. Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal parameters in patients with MCSM after ACDF and to identify the risk factors of poor clinical outcomes.

Material And Methods: ACDF was performed in 89 patients with MCSM. Based on average JOA recovery rate, patients were divided good-outcome group (group GO) and poor-outcome group (group PO). The cervical sagittal parameters including Cobb angle, SVA, T1S, cranial tilt and cervical tilt were measured. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors.

Results: Fifty-four patients (60.67%) were divided into group GO, while 35 patients (39.33%) were divided into group PO. Cobb angle, SVA and T1S was corrected from preoperative average 11.80° ± 9.63°, 23.69 mm ± 11.69 mm and 24.43° ± 11.78° to postoperative average 15.08° ± 9.05°, 18.79 mm ± 10.78 mm and 26.92° ± 11.94° respectively (p < 0.001). △Cobb angle (p = 0.008) and △SVA (p = 0.009) showed significantly statistical differences between two groups. Longer symptom duration, lower preoperative JOA score, smaller △Cobb angle and larger △SVA were identified as risk factors of poor clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: Multi-level ACDF is an effective surgical method to treat patients with MCSM. However, long duration of preoperative symptoms, lower preoperative JOA score, smaller △Cobb angle and larger △SVA are risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with MCSM after ACDF. Sagittal parameters should be paid attention to in surgery.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Outcomes of Modified Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty Combined with Short-Level Anterior Cervical Fusion in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Chen S, Yeh K, Peng C, Chang C, Chen H, Yu T Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768936 PMC: 11676656. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122057.


Using Finite Element Models to Assess Spinal Cord Biomechanics after Cervical Laminoplasty for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Rahman M, Palmer P, Harinathan B, Banurekha Devaraj K, Yoganandan N, Vedantam A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061634 PMC: 11276270. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141497.


Two Methods of Forward Head Posture Assessment: Radiography vs. Posture and Their Clinical Comparison.

Oakley P, Moustafa I, Haas J, Betz J, Harrison D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610914 PMC: 11012400. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072149.


Sagittal sequence and clinical efficacy of cervical disc replacement and hybrid surgery in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study.

Zheng B, Xu S, Lu T, Wu Y, Li H, Guo C Front Surg. 2024; 10:1265349.

PMID: 38249309 PMC: 10797051. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1265349.


Clinicoradiological Risk Factors Associated with Inability to Achieve Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Operated Cases of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Acharya S, Khanna V, Chahal R, Kalra K, Vishwakarma G Asian Spine J. 2023; 17(5):904-915.

PMID: 37463661 PMC: 10622822. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2022.0446.


References
1.
Manzano G, Casella G, Wang M, Vanni S, Levi A . A prospective, randomized trial comparing expansile cervical laminoplasty and cervical laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2012; 70(2):264-77. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182305669. View

2.
Faldini C, Chehrassan M, Perna F, Borghi R, Mazzotti A, Traina F . Single level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2017; 26(Suppl 3):423-424. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5271-8. View

3.
Scheer J, Tang J, Smith J, Acosta Jr F, Protopsaltis T, Blondel B . Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(2):141-59. DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12838. View

4.
Weng C, Wang J, Tuchman A, Wang J, Fu C, Hsieh P . Influence of T1 Slope on the Cervical Sagittal Balance in Degenerative Cervical Spine: An Analysis Using Kinematic MRI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(3):185-90. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001353. View

5.
Yokoyama K, Kawanishi M, Yamada M, Tanaka H, Ito Y, Kawabata S . Age-related variations in global spinal alignment and sagittal balance in asymptomatic Japanese adults. Neurol Res. 2017; 39(5):414-418. DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2017.1296654. View