» Articles » PMID: 22642354

Double Dissociation: Circadian Off-peak Times Increase Emotional Reactivity; Aging Impairs Emotion Regulation Via Reappraisal

Overview
Journal Emotion
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 May 31
PMID 22642354
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explored how the effectiveness of specific emotion regulation strategies might be influenced by aging and by time of day, given that in older age the circadian peak in cognitive performance is earlier in the day. We compared the benefit gained by 40 older (60-78 years; 20 women) and 40 younger (18-30 years; 20 women) adults during either on-peak or off-peak circadian times on 2 specific types of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: distraction and reappraisal. Participants rated their negative emotional responses to negative and neutral images under 3 conditions: a baseline nonregulation condition, a distraction condition involving a working memory task, and a reappraisal condition that involved reinterpreting the situation displayed using specific preselected strategies. First, as hypothesized, there was a crossover interaction such that participants in each age group reported more negative reactivity at their off-peak time of day. Second, a double dissociation was observed as circadian rhythms affected only negative reactivity-with reactivity highest at off-peak times-and aging diminished reappraisal but not distraction ability or reactivity. These findings add to growing evidence that understanding the effects of aging on emotion and emotion regulation depends on taking both time of day and type of regulatory strategy into account.

Citing Articles

Age differences in the influence of self-esteem and emotional regulation on memory.

Doron Y, Anaki D Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1346693.

PMID: 39301006 PMC: 11410706. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346693.


Nocturnal selective pressures on the evolution of human musicality as a missing piece of the adaptationist puzzle.

Varella M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1215481.

PMID: 37860295 PMC: 10582961. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215481.


The Role of Autobiographical Resilience Memories in Emotion Regulation: An Account of Age Differences in Mnemonic and Positive Reappraisal.

Orlovsky I, Ready R, Gutchess A, Heideman K, Martins-Klein B Exp Aging Res. 2023; 50(5):652-677.

PMID: 37690029 PMC: 10924802. DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2023.2254659.


The relationship between cognitive reserve and the spontaneous use of emotion regulation strategies in older adults: a cross-sectional study.

Colombo B, Hamilton A, Telazzi I, Balzarotti S Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023; 35(7):1505-1512.

PMID: 37142942 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-023-02424-9.


Preferential consolidation of emotional reactivity during sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lipinska G, Austin H, Moonsamy J, Henry M, Lewis R, Baldwin D Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:976047.

PMID: 36268469 PMC: 9578377. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.976047.


References
1.
West R, Murphy K, Armilio M, Craik F, Stuss D . Effects of time of day on age differences in working memory. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57(1):P3-10. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p3. View

2.
Bradley M, Codispoti M, Sabatinelli D, Lang P . Emotion and motivation II: sex differences in picture processing. Emotion. 2003; 1(3):300-19. View

3.
van Eekelen A, Houtveen J, Kerkhof G . Circadian variation in cardiac autonomic activity: reactivity measurements to different types of stressors. Chronobiol Int. 2004; 21(1):107-29. DOI: 10.1081/cbi-120027983. View

4.
Kross E, Ayduk O . Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008; 34(7):924-38. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208315938. View

5.
Isaacowitz D, Toner K, Goren D, Wilson H . Looking while unhappy: mood-congruent gaze in young adults, positive gaze in older adults. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(9):848-53. PMC: 2760922. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02167.x. View