» Articles » PMID: 22629202

Implementing Best Practices and Validation of Cryopreservation Techniques for Microorganisms

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 May 26
PMID 22629202
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Authentic, well preserved living organisms are basic elements for research in the life sciences and biotechnology. They are grown and utilized in laboratories around the world and are key to many research programmes, industrial processes and training courses. They are vouchers for publications and must be available for confirmation of results, further study or reinvestigation when new technologies become available. These biological resources must be maintained without change in biological resource collections. In order to achieve best practice in the maintenance and provision of biological materials for industry, research and education the appropriate standards must be followed. Cryopreservation is often the best preservation method available to achieve these aims, allowing long term, stable storage of important microorganisms. To promulgate best practice the Organisation for Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD published the best practice guidelines for BRCs. The OECD best practice consolidated the efforts of the UK National Culture Collections, the European Common Access to Biological Resources and Information (CABRI) project consortium and the World Federation for Culture Collections. The paper discusses quality management options and reviews cryopreservation of fungi, describing how the reproducibility and quality of the technique is maintained in order to retain the full potential of fungi.

Citing Articles

Cultures as types and the utility of viable specimens for fungal nomenclature.

Yurkov A, Visagie C, Crous P, Hashimoto A, Baschien C, Begerow D IMA Fungus. 2024; 15(1):20.

PMID: 39049113 PMC: 11267820. DOI: 10.1186/s43008-024-00155-8.


A Basic Guide to the Growth and Manipulation of the Blast Fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae.

Molinari C, Talbot N Curr Protoc. 2022; 2(8):e523.

PMID: 35997707 PMC: 9542439. DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.523.


Isolation and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from swine feces for feed additive composition.

Marchwinska K, Gwiazdowska D Arch Microbiol. 2021; 204(1):61.

PMID: 34940898 PMC: 8702511. DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02700-0.


Microbial occurrence in liquid nitrogen storage tanks: a challenge for cryobanking?.

Bajerski F, Nagel M, Overmann J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021; 105(20):7635-7650.

PMID: 34559283 PMC: 8460408. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11531-4.


Nomenclatural issues concerning cultured yeasts and other fungi: why it is important to avoid unneeded name changes.

Yurkov A, Alves A, Bai F, Boundy-Mills K, Buzzini P, cadez N IMA Fungus. 2021; 12(1):18.

PMID: 34256869 PMC: 8278710. DOI: 10.1186/s43008-021-00067-x.


References
1.
Butterfield W, Jong S, Alexander M . Preservation of living fungi pathogenic for man and animals. Can J Microbiol. 1974; 20(12):1665-73. DOI: 10.1139/m74-258. View

2.
Hwang S . Long-term preservation of fungus cultures with liquid nitrogen refrigeration. Appl Microbiol. 1966; 14(5):784-8. PMC: 1058415. DOI: 10.1128/am.14.5.784-788.1966. View

3.
Mosmann T . Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983; 65(1-2):55-63. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. View

4.
Grange J, Clark K . Use of umbelliferone derivatives in the study of enzyme activities of mycobacteria. J Clin Pathol. 1977; 30(2):151-3. PMC: 476339. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.30.2.151. View

5.
Ryan M, Smith D . Fungal genetic resource centres and the genomic challenge. Mycol Res. 2005; 108(Pt 12):1351-62. DOI: 10.1017/s0953756204001650. View