» Articles » PMID: 22622788

Recommendations for Ethical Approaches to Genotype-driven Research Recruitment

Overview
Journal Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2012 May 25
PMID 22622788
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recruiting research participants based on genetic information generated about them in a prior study is a potentially powerful way to study the functional significance of human genetic variation. However, it also presents significant ethical challenges that, to date, have received only minimal consideration. We convened a multi-disciplinary workshop to discuss key issues relevant to the conduct and oversight of genotype-driven recruitment and to translate those considerations into practical policy recommendations. Workshop participants were invited from around the US, and included genomic researchers and study coordinators, research participants, clinicians, bioethics scholars, experts in human research protections, and government representatives. Discussion was directed by experienced facilitators and informed by empirical data collected in a national survey of IRB chairs and in-depth interviews with research participants in studies where genotype-driven recontact occurred. A high degree of consensus was attained on the resulting seven recommendations, which cover informed consent disclosures and choices, the process for how and by whom participants are recontacted, the disclosure of individual genetic research results, and the importance of tailoring approaches based on specific contextual factors. These recommendations are intended to represent a balanced approach-protecting research participants, yet avoiding overly restrictive policies that hinder advancement on important scientific questions.

Citing Articles

How to communicate and what to disclose to participants in a recall-by-genotype research approach: a multistep empirical study.

Tschigg K, Consoli L, Bruggemann N, Hicks A, Staunton C, Mascalzoni D J Community Genet. 2024; 15(6):615-630.

PMID: 39325315 PMC: 11645387. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00733-8.


Genotype first: Clinical genomics research through a reverse phenotyping approach.

Wilczewski C, Obasohan J, Paschall J, Zhang S, Singh S, Maxwell G Am J Hum Genet. 2023; 110(1):3-12.

PMID: 36608682 PMC: 9892776. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.12.004.


Participant perspective on the recall-by-genotype research approach: a mixed-method embedded study with participants of the CHRIS study.

Biasiotto R, Kosters M, Tschigg K, Pramstaller P, Bruggemann N, Borsche M Eur J Hum Genet. 2023; 31(11):1218-1227.

PMID: 36599941 PMC: 10620385. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01277-6.


Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.

Tschigg K, Consoli L, Biasiotto R, Mascalzoni D Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(9):1000-1010.

PMID: 35705790 PMC: 9437022. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01120-y.


Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.

Mascalzoni D, Biasiotto R, Borsche M, Bruggemann N, De Grandi A, Goegele M Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 29(7):1146-1157.

PMID: 33981014 PMC: 8298596. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00860-7.


References
1.
Emanuel E, Menikoff J . Reforming the regulations governing research with human subjects. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(12):1145-50. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb1106942. View

2.
Beskow L, Sandler R, Weinberger M . Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(11):1920-6. PMC: 1751818. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061556. View

3.
Fernandez C . Public expectations for return of results--time to stop being paternalistic?. Am J Bioeth. 2008; 8(11):46-8. DOI: 10.1080/15265160802513127. View

4.
Shalowitz D, Miller F . Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants. JAMA. 2005; 294(6):737-40. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.6.737. View

5.
Chulada P, Vahdat H, Sharp R, DeLozier T, Watkins P, Pusek S . The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: a DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci. Hum Genet. 2008; 123(2):207-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-007-0457-5. View