» Articles » PMID: 15455364

Ethical Issues in Identifying and Recruiting Participants for Familial Genetic Research

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2004 Sep 30
PMID 15455364
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Family-based research is essential to understanding the genetic and environmental etiology of human disease. The success of family-based research often depends on investigators' ability to identify, recruit, and achieve a high participation rate among eligible family members. However, recruitment of family members raises ethical concerns due to the tension between protecting participants' privacy and promoting research quality, and guidelines for these activities are not well established. The Cancer Genetics Network Bioethics Committee assembled a multidisciplinary group to explore the scientific and ethical issues that arise in the process of family-based recruitment. The group used a literature review as well as expert opinion to develop recommendations about appropriate approaches to identifying, contacting, and recruiting family members. We conclude that there is no single correct approach, but recommend a balanced approach that takes into account the nature of the particular study as well as its recruitment goals. Recruitment of family members should be viewed as part of the research protocol and should require appropriate informed consent of the already-enrolled participant. Investigators should inform prospective participants why they are being contacted, how information about them was obtained, and what will happen to that information if they decide not to participate. The recruitment process should also be sensitive to the fact that some individuals from families at increased genetic risk will have no prior knowledge of their risk status. These recommendations are put forward to promote further discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches to family-based recruitment. They suggest a framework for considering alternative recruitment strategies and their implications, as well as highlight areas in need of further empirical research.

Citing Articles

How to communicate and what to disclose to participants in a recall-by-genotype research approach: a multistep empirical study.

Tschigg K, Consoli L, Bruggemann N, Hicks A, Staunton C, Mascalzoni D J Community Genet. 2024; 15(6):615-630.

PMID: 39325315 PMC: 11645387. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00733-8.


Recruitment into antibody prevalence studies: a randomized trial of postcards vs. letters as invitations.

Ley C, Duan H, Parsonnet J BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):170.

PMID: 37481522 PMC: 10363298. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01992-8.


Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.

Tschigg K, Consoli L, Biasiotto R, Mascalzoni D Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(9):1000-1010.

PMID: 35705790 PMC: 9437022. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01120-y.


Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.

Labude M, Shen L, Zhu Y, Schaefer G, Ong C, Xafis V PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0241783.

PMID: 33382683 PMC: 7774925. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241783.


Patient perspectives on use of electronic health records for research recruitment.

Beskow L, Brelsford K, Hammack C BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19(1):42.

PMID: 30808279 PMC: 6390331. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0686-z.