» Articles » PMID: 22609541

FXR Signaling in the Enterohepatic System

Overview
Date 2012 May 22
PMID 22609541
Citations 168
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Enterohepatic circulation serves to capture bile acids and other steroid metabolites produced in the liver and secreted to the intestine, for reabsorption back into the circulation and reuptake to the liver. This process is under tight regulation by nuclear receptor signaling. Bile acids, produced from cholesterol, can alter gene expression in the liver and small intestine via activating the nuclear receptors farnesoid X receptor (FXR; NR1H4), pregnane X receptor (PXR; NR1I2), vitamin D receptor (VDR; NR1I1), G protein coupled receptor TGR5, and other cell signaling pathways (JNK1/2, AKT and ERK1/2). Among these controls, FXR is known to be a major bile acid-responsive ligand-activated transcription factor and a crucial control element for maintaining bile acid homeostasis. FXR has a high affinity for several major endogenous bile acids, notably cholic acid, deoxycholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid, and lithocholic acid. By responding to excess bile acids, FXR is a bridge between the liver and small intestine to control bile acid levels and regulate bile acid synthesis and enterohepatic flow. FXR is highly expressed in the liver and gut, relative to other tissues, and contributes to the maintenance of cholesterol/bile acid homeostasis by regulating a variety of metabolic enzymes and transporters. FXR activation also affects lipid and glucose metabolism, and can influence drug metabolism.

Citing Articles

Microbial transformations of bile acids and their receptors in the regulation of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Gao Y, Lin J, Ye C, Guo S, Jiang C Liver Res. 2025; 7(3):165-176.

PMID: 39958385 PMC: 11792070. DOI: 10.1016/j.livres.2023.09.002.


Gut microbiota, immunity, and bile acid metabolism: decoding metabolic disease interactions.

Zhao Q, Wu J, Ding Y, Pang Y, Jiang C Life Metab. 2025; 2(6):load032.

PMID: 39872860 PMC: 11749371. DOI: 10.1093/lifemeta/load032.


Interplay of Oxidative Stress, Gut Microbiota, and Nicotine in Metabolic-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD).

Mignini I, Galasso L, Piccirilli G, Calvez V, Termite F, Esposto G Antioxidants (Basel). 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39765860 PMC: 11727446. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13121532.


Investigating the Effects of Dietary Bile Acids on Production Performance and Lipid Metabolism in Late-Phase Laying Hens.

Wang L, Fan K, Xing R, Yin J, Si X, Zhang H Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765458 PMC: 11672458. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243554.


Enhanced dynamic coupling in a nuclear receptor underlies ligand activity.

Yu T, Villalona P, Khan S, Mikeasky N, Meinert E, Magafas J J Biol Chem. 2024; 301(2):108081.

PMID: 39675705 PMC: 11783427. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.108081.


References
1.
Li T, Matozel M, Boehme S, Kong B, Nilsson L, Guo G . Overexpression of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase promotes hepatic bile acid synthesis and secretion and maintains cholesterol homeostasis. Hepatology. 2011; 53(3):996-1006. PMC: 3079544. DOI: 10.1002/hep.24107. View

2.
Kir S, Beddow S, Samuel V, Miller P, Previs S, Suino-Powell K . FGF19 as a postprandial, insulin-independent activator of hepatic protein and glycogen synthesis. Science. 2011; 331(6024):1621-4. PMC: 3076083. DOI: 10.1126/science.1198363. View

3.
Moschetta A, L Bookout A, Mangelsdorf D . Prevention of cholesterol gallstone disease by FXR agonists in a mouse model. Nat Med. 2004; 10(12):1352-8. DOI: 10.1038/nm1138. View

4.
Lu Y, Heydel J, Li X, Bratton S, Lindblom T, Radominska-Pandya A . Lithocholic acid decreases expression of UGT2B7 in Caco-2 cells: a potential role for a negative farnesoid X receptor response element. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005; 33(7):937-46. PMC: 2652669. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.104.003061. View

5.
Coppola C, Gosche J, Arrese M, Ancowitz B, Madsen J, Vanderhoof J . Molecular analysis of the adaptive response of intestinal bile acid transport after ileal resection in the rat. Gastroenterology. 1998; 115(5):1172-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70088-5. View