Pulmonary Outflow Tract Obstruction in Fetuses with Complex Congenital Heart Disease: Predicting the Need for Neonatal Intervention
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To identify prenatal echocardiographic markers that could predict the need for neonatal intervention in fetuses with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 52 fetuses with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Echocardiograms were evaluated for fetuses with either two-ventricle anatomy with a large ventricular septal defect or single-ventricle anatomy. Fetuses with pulmonary atresia were excluded. Parameters were compared between groups that did and did not require an intervention at age < 30 days.
Results: Fifty-two fetuses were studied; 20 (38%) underwent neonatal intervention and 32 (62%) did not. The most common diagnosis was tetralogy of Fallot (n = 32). Fetuses with two ventricles that required an intervention had lower pulmonary valve diameter Z-score (PV-Z-score) (-4.8 ± 2.1 vs. -2.6 ± 1.1; P = 0.0002) and lower pulmonary valve to aortic valve annular diameter ratio (PV/AoV) (0.53 ± 0.15 vs. 0.66 ± 0.1; P = 0.003). Using a PV/AoV ratio of < 0.6 or a PV-Z-score of < -3 at final echocardiographic examination was highly sensitive (92%) but poorly specific (50%), whereas classifying direction of flow in the ductus arteriosus as either normal (all pulmonary-to-aorta) or abnormal (aorta-to-pulmonary or bidirectional) was both highly sensitive (100%) and specific (95%) for predicting the need for a neonatal intervention. Parameters for the single-ventricle cohort did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions: Analysis of the pulmonary outflow tract and ductus arteriosus flow in the fetus with complex congenital heart disease can aid in identifying those that will require a neonatal intervention to augment pulmonary blood flow. This has important implications for the planning of delivery strategies.
Access to Specialized Care Across the Lifespan in Tetralogy of Fallot.
Mackie A, Bravo-Jaimes K, Keir M, Sillman C, Kovacs A CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2024; 2(6Part A):267-282.
PMID: 38161668 PMC: 10755796. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.09.004.
Narrative review of single ventricle: where are we after 40 years?.
Corno A, Findley T, Salazar J Transl Pediatr. 2023; 12(2):221-244.
PMID: 36891374 PMC: 9986776. DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-573.
Park S, Won H, Kim R, Kim M, Yu J, Park C Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2022; 20(1):4.
PMID: 35189903 PMC: 8859889. DOI: 10.1186/s12947-022-00274-5.
Wolter A, Markert N, Wolter J, Kurkevych A, Degenhardt J, Ritgen J Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021; 304(1):81-90.
PMID: 33585987 PMC: 8164597. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05929-0.
Lussier E, Yeh S, Chih W, Lin S, Chou Y, Huang S PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0233179.
PMID: 32584813 PMC: 7316227. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233179.