» Articles » PMID: 22592806

Linking Surveillance with Action Against Drug-resistant Tuberculosis

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2012 May 18
PMID 22592806
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The speed at which most countries with high burdens of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB) have scaled up their capacity to diagnose and treat individuals with these forms of TB has failed to keep pace with the problem. Limited availability of drug susceptibility testing, high costs and inefficiencies in the supply of second-line drugs, and inadequate capacity for the management of patients with MDRTB have contributed to the wide gap between the estimated need for and the delivery of MDRTB treatment. The most recent global estimates indicate that only about 1 in 20 individuals with incident MDRTB will be properly diagnosed; fewer still receive quality-assured treatment. As policy makers confront the threat of growing levels of drug-resistant TB, there is a clear role for improved surveillance methods that can facilitate more effective public health responses. In countries that cannot yet test all incident cases for drug resistance, analysis of programmatic data and use of periodic, efficient surveys can provide information to help prioritize the use of limited resources to geographic areas or population subgroups of greatest concern. We describe methods for the analysis of routinely collected data and alternative surveys that can help tighten the link between surveillance activities and interventions.

Citing Articles

Spatially targeted screening to reduce tuberculosis transmission in high-incidence settings.

Cudahy P, Andrews J, Bilinski A, Dowdy D, Mathema B, Menzies N Lancet Infect Dis. 2018; 19(3):e89-e95.

PMID: 30554997 PMC: 6401264. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30443-2.


Use of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling to Ascertain Levels of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in Western Kenya.

Jezmir J, Cohen T, Zignol M, Nyakan E, Hedt-Gauthier B, Gardner A PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0154142.

PMID: 27167381 PMC: 4864281. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154142.


Geographical heterogeneity of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Georgia, January 2009 to June 2011.

Jenkins H, Gegia M, Furin J, Kalandadze I, Nanava U, Chakhaia T Euro Surveill. 2014; 19(11).

PMID: 24679722 PMC: 4090679. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.11.20743.


Alignment of new tuberculosis drug regimens and drug susceptibility testing: a framework for action.

Wells W, Boehme C, Cobelens F, Daniels C, Dowdy D, Gardiner E Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13(5):449-58.

PMID: 23531393 PMC: 4012744. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70025-2.


Assessing spatial heterogeneity of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-burden country.

Jenkins H, Plesca V, Ciobanu A, Crudu V, Galusca I, Soltan V Eur Respir J. 2012; 42(5):1291-301.

PMID: 23100496 PMC: 3800490. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00111812.

References
1.
Bonetti M, Pagano M . The interpoint distance distribution as a descriptor of point patterns, with an application to spatial disease clustering. Stat Med. 2004; 24(5):753-73. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1947. View

2.
Farmer P, Kim J . Community based approaches to the control of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: introducing "DOTS-plus". BMJ. 1998; 317(7159):671-4. PMC: 1113843. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7159.671. View

3.
Espinal M, Kim S, Suarez P, Kam K, KHOMENKO A, Migliori G . Standard short-course chemotherapy for drug-resistant tuberculosis: treatment outcomes in 6 countries. JAMA. 2000; 283(19):2537-45. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.19.2537. View

4.
Hedt B, van Leth F, Zignol M, Cobelens F, Van Gemert W, Nhung N . Multidrug resistance among new tuberculosis cases: detecting local variation through lot quality-assurance sampling. Epidemiology. 2012; 23(2):293-300. PMC: 3276714. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182459455. View

5.
Ozonoff A, Webster T, Vieira V, Weinberg J, Ozonoff D, Aschengrau A . Cluster detection methods applied to the Upper Cape Cod cancer data. Environ Health. 2005; 4:19. PMC: 1242352. DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-4-19. View