» Articles » PMID: 22581987

Differences in Trouble Per Litre of Different Alcoholic Beverages - A Global Comparison with the GENACIS Dataset

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2012 May 15
PMID 22581987
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different alcoholic beverages are seen as causing more or less trouble, with spirits historically often seen as the most troublesome. Differences in the "trouble per litre" could reflect differences in the beverages themselves (e.g., faster effect of stronger beverages, additives/contaminants in informal beverages), or could reflect characteristics of those drinking each beverage. Using two alternative definitions of beverage choice and measures of personal and of social consequences of drinking, the paper examines trouble per litre among beer, wine and spirits drinkers in 19 different societies represented in the GENACIS dataset. There is no general pattern which holds across cultures of more or less trouble being associated with a particular beverage type. Wine seems to be less associated with trouble than beer or spirits in a number of societies, but there are counter-instances in other societies. There is no overall trend across cultures in comparing trouble associated with beer and with spirits. In a number of societies, drinkers with no predominant beverage report more problems than those mainly drinking beer or wine. Controlling for gender and age reduces the tilt towards less trouble from wine drinking, particularly for social consequences of drinking.

Citing Articles

Predictors of beverage-specific, alcohol consumption trajectories: A Swedish population-based cohort study.

Sidorchuk A, Engstrom K, Moller J, Gemes K Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023; 40(3):233-249.

PMID: 37255610 PMC: 10225962. DOI: 10.1177/14550725221124386.


High Intensity Drinking (HID) Assessed by Maximum Quantity Consumed Is an Important Pattern Measure Adding Predictive Value in Higher and Lower Income Societies for Modeling Alcohol-Related Problems.

Greenfield T, Lui C, Cook W, Karriker-Jaffe K, Li L, Wilsnack S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 36834453 PMC: 9958696. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043748.


Associations between Low to Moderate Consumption of Alcoholic Beverage Types and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Estruch R, Hendriks H Alcohol Alcohol. 2021; 57(2):176-184.

PMID: 34897368 PMC: 8919407. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agab082.


Cross-sectional surveys of financial harm associated with others' drinking in 15 countries: Unequal effects on women?.

Laslett A, Jiang H, Kuntsche S, Stanesby O, Wilsnack S, Sundin E Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 211:107949.

PMID: 32334893 PMC: 7200291. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107949.


Drinking beer, wine or spirits - does it matter for inequalities in alcohol-related hospital admission? A record-linked longitudinal study in Wales.

Gartner A, Trefan L, Moore S, Akbari A, Paranjothy S, Farewell D BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1651.

PMID: 31818272 PMC: 6902530. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-8015-3.


References
1.
Rogers J, Greenfield T . Beer drinking accounts for most of the hazardous alcohol consumption reported in the United States. J Stud Alcohol. 1999; 60(6):732-9. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.732. View

2.
Altman D, Bland J . Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ. 2003; 326(7382):219. PMC: 1125071. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219. View

3.
Wilsnack R, Wilsnack S, Kristjanson A, Vogeltanz-Holm N, Gmel G . Gender and alcohol consumption: patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Addiction. 2009; 104(9):1487-500. PMC: 2844334. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02696.x. View

4.
Graham K, Bernards S, Knibbe R, Kairouz S, Kuntsche S, Wilsnack S . Alcohol-related negative consequences among drinkers around the world. Addiction. 2011; 106(8):1391-405. PMC: 3682406. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03425.x. View