» Articles » PMID: 22545901

Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta) and Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus Apella) Remember Future Responses in a Computerized Task

Overview
Date 2012 May 2
PMID 22545901
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Planning is an important aspect of many daily activities for humans. Planning involves forming a strategy in anticipation of a future need. However, evidence that nonhuman animals can plan for future situations is limited, particularly in relation to the many other kinds of cognitive capacities that they appear to share with humans. One critical aspect of planning is the ability to remember future responses, or what is called prospective coding. Two monkey species (Macaca mulatta and Cebus apella) performed a series of computerized tasks that required encoding a future response at the outset of each trial. Monkeys of both species showed competence in all tests that were given, providing evidence that they anticipated future responses and that they appropriately engaged in those responses when the time was right for such responses. In addition, some tests demonstrated that monkeys even remembered future responses that were not as presently motivating as were other aspects of the task environment. These results indicated that monkeys could anticipate future responses and retain and implement those responses when appropriate.

Citing Articles

Glutathione disrupts galectin-10 Charcot-Leyden crystal formation to possibly ameliorate eosinophil-based diseases such as asthma.

Na H, Sayed H, Ayala G, Wang X, Liu Y, Yu J Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2023; 55(4):613-622.

PMID: 36988350 PMC: 10195141. DOI: 10.3724/abbs.2023050.


Prospective representations in rat orbitofrontal ensembles.

Zhou J, Zong W, Jia C, Gardner M, Schoenbaum G Behav Neurosci. 2021; 135(4):518-527.

PMID: 34165997 PMC: 9344202. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000451.


Co-operation of long-term and working memory representations in simultaneous chaining by rhesus monkeys ().

Templer V, Gazes R, Hampton R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019; 72(9):2208-2224.

PMID: 30827186 PMC: 6693949. DOI: 10.1177/1747021819838432.


I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Smith J, Boomer J, Church B, Zakrzewski A, Beran M, Baum M J Comp Psychol. 2018; 132(2):152-165.

PMID: 29658725 PMC: 5945321. DOI: 10.1037/com0000100.


Of Men and Mice: Modeling the Fragile X Syndrome.

Dahlhaus R Front Mol Neurosci. 2018; 11:41.

PMID: 29599705 PMC: 5862809. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00041.


References
1.
Rainer G, Rao S, Miller E . Prospective coding for objects in primate prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(13):5493-505. PMC: 6782318. View

2.
WASHBURN D . Analyzing the path of responding in maze-solving and other tasks. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1992; 24(2):248-52. DOI: 10.3758/bf03203502. View

3.
Urcuioli P, Zentall T . Transfer across delayed discriminations: evidence regarding the nature of prospective working memory. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992; 18(2):154-73. DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.18.2.154. View

4.
Kliegel M, McDaniel M, Einstein G . Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: a new approach and age-related effects. Mem Cognit. 2000; 28(6):1041-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03209352. View

5.
Colombo M, Graziano M . Effects of auditory and visual interference on auditory-visual delayed matching to sample in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Behav Neurosci. 1994; 108(3):636-9. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.108.3.636. View