Measuring Media Exposure to Contradictory Health Information: A Comparative Analysis of Four Potential Measures

Overview

Journal Commun Methods Meas

Date 2012 Apr 21

PMID 22518202

Citations 18

Authors

Rebekah H Nagler

Robert C Hornik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

There is increasing concern that the news media present conflicting health information on topics including cancer screening and nutrition, yet little is known about whether people notice such content. This study proposes four potential measures of media exposure to contradictory health information, using nutrition as an example (Measures I-IV). The measures varied on two dimensions: (1) content specificity, or whether specific nutrition topics and health consequences were mentioned in the question scripting, and (2) obtrusiveness, or whether "contradictory or conflicting information" was mentioned. Using data from the Annenberg National Health Communication Survey (ANHCS), we evaluated the performance of each measure against a set of validity criteria including nomological, convergent, and face validity. Overall, measure IV, which was moderately content-specific and obtrusive, performed consistently well and may prove most useful to researchers studying media effects of contradictory health information. Future directions and applications are discussed.

Citing Articles

Beyond belief: a cross-genre study on perception and validation of health information online.

Zuo C, Mathur K, Kela D, Salek Faramarzi N, Banerjee R Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022; 13(4):299-314.

PMID: 35128039 PMC: 8807956. DOI: 10.1007/s41060-022-00310-7.

Fatalism and exposure to health information from the media: examining the evidence for causal influence.

Ramondt S, Ramirez A Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2021; 41(3-4):298-320.

PMID: 34307882 PMC: 8297407. DOI: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1387502.

Prevalence and Potential Consequences of Exposure to Conflicting Information about Mammography: Results from Nationally-Representative Survey of U.S. Adults.

Gollust S, Fowler E, Nagler R Health Commun. 2021; 38(2):349-362.

PMID: 34259097 PMC: 8758803. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1951958.

Media Exposure, Cancer Beliefs, and Cancer-Related Information-Seeking or Avoidance Behavior Patterns in China.

He R, Li Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(6).

PMID: 33803594 PMC: 8002949. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063130.

Public perceptions of conflicting information surrounding COVID-19: Results from a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults.

Nagler R, Vogel R, Gollust S, Rothman A, Fowler E, Yzer M PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0240776.

PMID: 33085719 PMC: 7577476. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240776.

References

Smith K, Edsall Kromm E, Klassen A . Print news coverage of cancer: what prevention messages are conveyed when screening is newsworthy?. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010; 34(4):434-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.02.006. View

Meissner H, Rimer B, Davis W, Eisner E, Siegler I . Another round in the mammography controversy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003; 12(3):261-76. DOI: 10.1089/154099903321667609. View

Boyle P, Boffetta P, Autier P . Diet, nutrition and cancer: public, media and scientific confusion. Ann Oncol. 2008; 19(10):1665-7. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn561. View

Han P, Moser R, Klein W . Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. J Health Commun. 2006; 11 Suppl 1:51-69. PMC: 4194067. DOI: 10.1080/10810730600637541. View

Greiner A, Smith K, Guallar E . Something fishy? News media presentation of complex health issues related to fish consumption guidelines. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13(11):1786-94. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010000923. View

Dorey E, McCool J . The role of the media in influencing children's nutritional perceptions. Qual Health Res. 2009; 19(5):645-54. DOI: 10.1177/1049732309334104. View

Houn F, Bober M, Huerta E, Hursting S, Lemon S, Weed D . The association between alcohol and breast cancer: popular press coverage of research. Am J Public Health. 1995; 85(8 Pt 1):1082-6. PMC: 1615825. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.8_pt_1.1082. View

Kushi L . Vitamin E and heart disease: a case study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69(6):1322S-1329S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/69.6.1322S. View

Han P, Moser R, Klein W . Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey. Health Expect. 2007; 10(4):321-36. PMC: 4198390. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00456.x. View

10.

Han P, Kobrin S, Klein W, Davis W, Stefanek M, Taplin S . Perceived ambiguity about screening mammography recommendations: association with future mammography uptake and perceptions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(3):458-66. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0533. View

11.

Dye C, Cason K . Perceptions of older, low-income women about increasing intake of fruits and vegetables. J Nutr Elder. 2006; 25(1):21-41. DOI: 10.1300/J052v25n01_04. View

12.

Niederdeppe J, Fowler E, Goldstein K, Pribble J . Does Local Television News Coverage Cultivate Fatalistic Beliefs about Cancer Prevention?. J Commun. 2010; 60(2):230-253. PMC: 2885705. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01474.x. View

13.

Cronbach L, Meehl P . Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955; 52(4):281-302. DOI: 10.1037/h0040957. View

14.

Taplin S, Urban N, Taylor V, Savarino J . Conflicting national recommendations and the use of screening mammography: does the physician's recommendation matter?. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1997; 10(2):88-95. View

15.

Goldberg J, Sliwa S . Communicating actionable nutrition messages: challenges and opportunities. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011; 70(1):26-37. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665110004714. View

16.

Rimer B, Halabi S, Strigo T, CRAWFORD Y, Lipkus I . Confusion about mammography: prevalence and consequences. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000; 8(4):509-20. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.509. View

17.

Goldberg J, Hellwig J . Nutrition research in the media: the challenge facing scientists. J Am Coll Nutr. 1998; 16(6):544-50. View

18.

. Improving public understanding: guidelines for communicating emerging science on nutrition, food safety, and health. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90(3):194-9. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.3.194. View

19.

Goldberg J . Nutrition and health communication: the message and the media over half a century. Nutr Rev. 1992; 50(3):71-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1992.tb01272.x. View

20.

Diekman C, Malcolm K . Consumer perception and insights on fats and fatty acids: knowledge on the quality of diet fat. Ann Nutr Metab. 2009; 54 Suppl 1:25-32. DOI: 10.1159/000220824. View