» Articles » PMID: 20519047

Something Fishy? News Media Presentation of Complex Health Issues Related to Fish Consumption Guidelines

Overview
Date 2010 Jun 4
PMID 20519047
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The news media are an important source of dietary information. Understanding news content, particularly the portrayal of risks and benefits of certain foods, is relevant for effective public health communication. Fish consumption may reduce risk for CVD and aid neonatal development, but recent work shows public confusion about the benefits of fish, challenged by the evidence of mercury and other contaminants in fish. We present an analysis of the messages about fish in US news media over 15 years, identifying trends in coverage and highlighting implications of current messaging.

Design: We conducted a descriptive text analysis and coded for manifest content: locality of focus, story frame, reference to studies, inclusion of government guidelines and portrayal of uncertainty. We identified chronological patterns and analysed the data for statistically significant relationships between media source and content.

Setting: News stories were selected from five daily newspapers and five television networks (1993-2007).

Subjects: We analysed 310 health-related news stories on fish.

Results: Risk messages outweighed benefit messages four to one, and health benefits only became prominent after 2002. No difference existed in coverage topic by news source. Fish consumption has increasingly become a national issue.

Conclusions: With the bulk of messages about fish consumption focused on risk, the benefits may be lost to consumers. This gap creates a need for public health to work with news media to more effectively communicate benefits and risks around fish consumption and health and to consider options for communicating tailored information where it can be more readily utilised.

Citing Articles

Effects of Prior Exposure to Conflicting Health Information on Responses to Subsequent Unrelated Health Messages: Results from a Population-Based Longitudinal Experiment.

Nagler R, Vogel R, Gollust S, Yzer M, Rothman A Ann Behav Med. 2021; 56(5):498-511.

PMID: 34398961 PMC: 9116588. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab069.


Revisiting nutrition backlash: Psychometric properties and discriminant validity of the nutrition backlash scale.

Jensen J, Giorgi E, Jackson J, Berger J, Katz R, Mobley A Nutrition. 2020; 78:110949.

PMID: 32871324 PMC: 7508894. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110949.


Maternal dietary intake of fish and PUFAs and child neurodevelopment at 6 months and 1 year of age: a nationwide birth cohort-the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).

Hamazaki K, Matsumura K, Tsuchida A, Kasamatsu H, Tanaka T, Ito M Am J Clin Nutr. 2020; 112(5):1295-1303.

PMID: 32766751 PMC: 7657336. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa190.


Confusion and nutritional backlash from news media exposure to contradictory information about carbohydrates and dietary fats.

Clark D, Nagler R, Niederdeppe J Public Health Nutr. 2019; 22(18):3336-3348.

PMID: 31587681 PMC: 10260685. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019002866.


Total Long-Chain n-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Food Sources in the United States Compared to Recommended Intakes: NHANES 2003-2008.

Richter C, Bowen K, Mozaffarian D, Kris-Etherton P, Skulas-Ray A Lipids. 2017; 52(11):917-927.

PMID: 28956299 DOI: 10.1007/s11745-017-4297-3.