» Articles » PMID: 22505658

The Combined Use of Surgery and Radiotherapy to Treat Patients with Epidural Cord Compression Due to Metastatic Disease: a Cost-utility Analysis

Overview
Journal Neuro Oncol
Specialties Neurology
Oncology
Date 2012 Apr 17
PMID 22505658
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neoplastic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression is a common complication of cancer that causes pain and progressive neurologic impairment. The previous standard treatment for this condition involved corticosteroids and radiotherapy (RT). Direct decompressive surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (S + RT) is now increasingly being chosen by clinicians to significantly improve patients' ability to walk and reduce their need for opioid analgesics and corticosteroids. A cost-utility analysis was conducted to compare S + RT with RT alone based on the landmark randomized clinical trial by Patchell et al. (2005). It was performed from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ontario-based costs were adjusted to 2010 US dollars. S + RT is more costly but also more effective than corticosteroids and RT alone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$250 307 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. First order probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the probability of S + RT being cost-effective is 18.11%. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed that there is a 91.11% probability of S + RT being cost-effective over RT alone at a willingness-to-pay of US$1 683 000 per QALY. In practice, the results of our study indicate that, by adopting the S + RT strategy, there would still be a chance of 18.11% of not paying extra at a willingness-to-pay of US$50 000 per QALY. Those results are sensitive to the costs of hospice palliative care. Our results suggest that adopting a standard S + RT approach for patients with MSCC is likely to increase health care costs but would result in improved outcomes.

Citing Articles

Radiotherapy and surgery: can this combination be further optimized for patients with metastatic spine disease?.

Amelink J, Bindels B, Kasperts N, MacDonald S, Tobert D, Verlaan J Oncologist. 2025; 30(1).

PMID: 39832131 PMC: 11745020. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae359.


Markov models for clinical decision-making in radiation oncology: A systematic review.

McCullum L, Karagoz A, Dede C, Garcia R, Nosrat F, Hemmati M J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 68(5):610-623.

PMID: 38766899 PMC: 11576491. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13656.


Determining patients with spinal metastases suitable for surgical intervention: A cost-effective analysis.

Hsieh H, Yen H, Tseng T, Pan Y, Liao M, Fu S Cancer Med. 2023; 12(19):20059-20069.

PMID: 37749979 PMC: 10587930. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6576.


Holistic Therapeutic Approaches Improve Functional Mobility in Patients With Postoperative Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF): A Case Report.

Pakhan A, Boob M, Somaiya K, Phansopkar P Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e44032.

PMID: 37746439 PMC: 10517586. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44032.


Economic Evaluation of Palliative Care for Patients with Cancer Disease: A Systematic Review.

Soltani Arabshahi S, Nikjoo S, Rezapour A, Rashki Kemmak A, Jahangiri R, Farabi H Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022; 36:141.

PMID: 36569396 PMC: 9774991. DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.36.141.


References
1.
Roski R, Pollock K . The fundamentals of building an effective neurosurgical practice. Clin Neurosurg. 2004; 51:43-7. View

2.
Loblaw D, Laperriere N . Emergency treatment of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: an evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16(4):1613-24. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1613. View

3.
Loblaw D, Laperriere N, Mackillop W . A population-based study of malignant spinal cord compression in Ontario. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2003; 15(4):211-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0936-6555(02)00400-4. View

4.
Edens P, Weber D . Evaluating technology for acquisition. J Oncol Manag. 2004; 13(2):26-30. View

5.
Naimark D, Krahn M, Naglie G, Redelmeier D, Detsky A . Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 5--Working with Markov processes. Med Decis Making. 1997; 17(2):152-9. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700205. View