» Articles » PMID: 22458595

A Computerized Tomography Study of the Morphological Interrelationship Between the Temporal Bones and the Craniofacial Complex

Overview
Journal J Anat
Date 2012 Mar 31
PMID 22458595
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The hypothesis that the temporal bones are at the center of the dynamics of the craniofacial complex, directly influencing facial morphology, has been put forward long ago. This study examines the role of the spatial positioning of temporal bones (frontal and sagittal inclination) in terms of influencing overall facial morphology. Several 3D linear, angular and orthogonal measurements obtained through computerized analysis of virtual models of 163 modern human skulls reconstructed from cone-beam computed tomography images were analyzed and correlated. Additionally, the sample was divided into two subgroups based on the median value of temporal bone sagittal inclination [anterior rotation group (n = 82); posterior rotation group (n = 81)], and differences between groups evaluated. Correlation coefficients showed that sagittal inclination of the temporal bone was significantly (P < 0.01) related to midline flexion, transversal width and anterior-posterior length of the basicranium, to the anterior-posterior positioning of the mandible and maxilla, and posterior midfacial height. Frontal inclination of the temporal bone was significantly related (P < 0.01) to basicranium anterior-posterior and transversal dimensions, and to posterior midfacial height. In comparison with the posterior rotation group, the anterior rotation group presented a less flexed and anterior-posteriorly longer cranial base, a narrower skull, porion and the articular eminence located more superiorly and posteriorly, a shorter posterior midfacial height, the palatal plane rotated clockwise, a more retrognathic maxilla and mandible, and the upper posterior occlusal plane more inclined and posteriorly located. The results suggest that differences in craniofacial morphology are highly integrated with differences in the positional relationship of the temporal bones. The sagittal inclination of the temporal bone seems to have a greater impact on the 3D morphology of the craniofacial complex than frontal inclination.

Citing Articles

Craniofacial orientation and parietal bone morphology in adult modern humans.

Pereira-Pedro A, Bruner E J Anat. 2021; 240(2):330-338.

PMID: 34498271 PMC: 8742967. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13543.


The fabrication of a customized occlusal splint based on the merging of dynamic jaw tracking records, cone beam computed tomography, and CAD-CAM digital impression.

Aslanidou K, Kau C, Vlachos C, Saleh T J Orthod Sci. 2017; 6(3):104-109.

PMID: 28717635 PMC: 5508405. DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_61_16.

References
1.
Bastir M, Rosas A, Lieberman D, OHiggins P . Middle cranial fossa anatomy and the origin of modern humans. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008; 291(2):130-40. DOI: 10.1002/ar.20636. View

2.
Buschang P, Baume R, Nass G . A craniofacial growth maturity gradient for males and females between 4 and 16 years of age. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1983; 61(3):373-81. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330610312. View

3.
Bastir M, Rosas A . Correlated variation between the lateral basicranium and the face: a geometric morphometric study in different human groups. Arch Oral Biol. 2006; 51(9):814-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.03.009. View

4.
Anderson D, Popovich F . Relation of cranial base flexure to cranial form and mandibular position. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1983; 61(2):181-7. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330610206. View

5.
Bastir M, Rosas A, Kuroe K . Petrosal orientation and mandibular ramus breadth: evidence for an integrated petroso-mandibular developmental unit. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004; 123(4):340-50. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10313. View