» Articles » PMID: 22452990

Prevalence of Dirofilaria Immitis, Ehrlichia Canis, Borrelia Burgdorferi Sensu Lato, Anaplasma Spp. and Leishmania Infantum in Apparently Healthy and CVBD-suspect Dogs in Portugal--a National Serological Study

Overview
Journal Parasit Vectors
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2012 Mar 29
PMID 22452990
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Canine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) are caused by a wide range of pathogens transmitted to dogs by arthropods including ticks and insects. Many CVBD-agents are of zoonotic concern, with dogs potentially serving as reservoirs and sentinels for human infections. The present study aimed at assessing the seroprevalence of infection with or exposure to Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma spp. and Leishmania infantum in dogs in Portugal.

Methods: Based on 120 veterinary medical centres from all the regions of mainland and insular Portugal, 557 apparently healthy and 628 CVBD-suspect dogs were sampled. Serum, plasma or whole blood was tested for qualitative detection of D. immitis antigen and antibodies to E. canis, B. burgdorferi s. l., Anaplasma spp. and L. infantum with two commercial in-clinic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors of exposure to the vector-borne agents.

Results: Total positivity levels to D. immitis, E. canis, B. burgdorferi, Anaplasma spp., L. infantum, one or more agents and mixed agents were 3.6%, 4.1%, 0.2%, 4.5%, 4.3%, 14.0% and 2.0% in the healthy group, and 8.9%, 16.4%, 0.5%, 9.2%, 25.2%, 46.3% and 11.6% in the clinically suspect group, respectively. Non-use of ectoparasiticides was a risk factor for positivity to one or more agents both in the apparently healthy (OR = 2.1) and CVBD-suspect (OR = 1.5) dogs. Seropositivity to L. infantum (OR = 7.6), E. canis (OR = 4.1) and D. immitis (OR = 2.4) were identified as risk factors for the presence of clinical signs compatible with CVBDs. Positivity to mixed agents was not found to be a risk factor for disease.

Conclusions: Dogs in Portugal are at risk of becoming infected with vector-borne pathogens, some of which are of zoonotic concern. CVBDs should be considered by practitioners and prophylactic measures must be put in place to protect dogs and limit the risk of transmission of vector-borne agents to humans. This study is expected to give veterinary and public health authorities an increased awareness about CVBDs in Portugal and to serve as a reference for future investigations and control actions.

Citing Articles

Comparison of ELISA and IFAT for Leishmania infantum by European and Middle Eastern diagnostic laboratories.

Mahachi K, Ozanne M, Bourdeau P, Sarquis J, Kontowicz E, Solano-Gallego L Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):545.

PMID: 39734221 PMC: 11684067. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06631-9.


Transmission risk of vector-borne bacterial diseases (Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia canis) in Spain and Portugal.

Balmori-de la Puente A, Rodriguez-Escolar I, Collado-Cuadrado M, Infante Gonzalez-Mohino E, Vieira Lista M, Hernandez-Lambrano R BMC Vet Res. 2024; 20(1):526.

PMID: 39593089 PMC: 11590303. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-04383-3.


Lyme disease in companion animals: an updated state-of-art and current situation in Portugal.

Picado R, Jota Baptista C, Meneses A, Legatti S, Fonseca J, Belas A Vet Res Commun. 2024; 48(6):3551-3561.

PMID: 39259416 PMC: 11538231. DOI: 10.1007/s11259-024-10532-8.


Global Distribution of Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis and the Role of the Dog in the Epidemiology of the Disease.

Vilas-Boas D, Nakasone E, Goncalves A, Lair D, Oliveira D, Pereira D Pathogens. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38921753 PMC: 11206782. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13060455.


Current State of Canine in Portugal.

Esteves-Guimaraes J, Matos J, Leal-Sousa B, Oliveira P, Lobo L, Silvestre-Ferreira A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38731304 PMC: 11083104. DOI: 10.3390/ani14091300.


References
1.
OConnor T, Hanscom J, Hegarty B, Groat R, Breitschwerdt E . Comparison of an indirect immunofluorescence assay, western blot analysis, and a commercially available ELISA for detection of Ehrlichia canis antibodies in canine sera. Am J Vet Res. 2006; 67(2):206-10. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.67.2.206. View

2.
Chandrashekar R, Mainville C, Beall M, OConnor T, Eberts M, Alleman A . Performance of a commercially available in-clinic ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, and Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis antigen in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2010; 71(12):1443-50. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.71.12.1443. View

3.
Steere A . Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(2):115-25. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200107123450207. View

4.
De Michelis S, Sewell H, Collares-Pereira M, Santos-Reis M, Schouls L, Benes V . Genetic diversity of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in ticks from mainland Portugal. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38(6):2128-33. PMC: 86744. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.38.6.2128-2133.2000. View

5.
Dantas-Torres F . Canine vector-borne diseases in Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2008; 1(1):25. PMC: 2533296. DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-1-25. View